Bulletin of the American Physical Society
66th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics
Monday–Friday, October 7–11, 2024; Atlanta, Georgia
Session NP12: Poster Session V:
Fundamental Plasma Physics III: waves, self-organization
Fundamental Plasma Physics IV: turbulence, reconnection, non-neutral/antimatter
High Field Tokamaks
Mirrors
9:30 AM - 12:30 PM
Wednesday, October 9, 2024
Hyatt Regency
Room: Grand Hall West
Abstract: NP12.00119 : Shadow Masks Predictions in SPARC Tokamak Plasma-Facing Components Using HEAT code and Machine Learning Methods*
Presenter:
Doménica Corona
(Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL))
Authors:
Doménica Corona
(Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL))
Stefano Munaretto
(Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL))
Michael Churchill
(Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory)
Manuel Scotto d'Abusco
(PPPL)
Tom Looby
(Commonwealth Fusion Systems)
Andreas Wingen
(Oak Ridge National Lab)
PFCs play a vital role in maintaining operational stability. However, simplistic axisymmetric assumptions often fail to capture the intricate interplay between 3-D PFC geometry and 2-D or 3-D plasmas, which can lead to to compromised performance or PFC failure such as melting. HEAT is a tool which addresses the critical need for high-precision 3-D predictions and analysis of PFCs in tokamaks.
ML techniques, particularly classifiers (ML method that categorizes data into different groups), are exploited to develop a surrogate model of the HEAT code, enabling efficient and accurate shadow mask predictions. Utilizing a diverse equilibrium variations database, including ranges of plasma current, q95 and incident magnetic flux angles as inputs to the ML model, this work aims to provide comprehensive insights into the behavior of the divertor system. Downstream implications of incorrect ML predictions will be analyzed from the engineering perspective of needed accuracy for design or operational choices.
By concentrating on shadowed regions within the divertor, this approach seeks to refine predictions and enhance the reliability of the surrogate model. The final goal is to use the surrogate model for real-time control, where a 3D plasma model provides inputs for a 3D temperature calculation. Furthermore, future work aims to implement the models in between shots or in real-time systems for control decisions.
*This work is supported by US DoE under DE-AC02-09CH11466, DE-AC05-00OR22725 and Commonwealth Fusion Systems.
Follow Us |
Engage
Become an APS Member |
My APS
Renew Membership |
Information for |
About APSThe American Physical Society (APS) is a non-profit membership organization working to advance the knowledge of physics. |
© 2024 American Physical Society
| All rights reserved | Terms of Use
| Contact Us
Headquarters
1 Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740-3844
(301) 209-3200
Editorial Office
100 Motor Pkwy, Suite 110, Hauppauge, NY 11788
(631) 591-4000
Office of Public Affairs
529 14th St NW, Suite 1050, Washington, D.C. 20045-2001
(202) 662-8700