Bulletin of the American Physical Society
APS April Meeting 2019
Volume 64, Number 3
Saturday–Tuesday, April 13–16, 2019; Denver, Colorado
Session Z08: Particle & Fields Theory III 
Hide Abstracts 
Sponsoring Units: DPF Chair: Keping Xie, Southern Methodist University Room: Sheraton Governor's Square 10 
Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:30PM  3:42PM 
Z08.00001: ABSTRACT WITHDRAWN

Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:42PM  3:54PM 
Z08.00002: Pauli Matrices in 3Space Gregory L Light The “massshell equation” E^{2} I_{3} = RE^{2} I_{3} + KE^{2} I_{3} = (RE I_{3} + i KE I_{3}) x (RE I_{3}  i KE I_{3}), where KE I_{3} = [a_{12}=a_{21}=1= a_{33}, elsewhere 0, call Matrix X] x [b_{12}=b_{21}= cℏk = b_{33}, elsewhere 0], implies E = RE +/ i pc = RE + KE, where i p I_{3} = ℏk I_{3} = the 3 possible angular momenta, with k converting the (linear) meter into (circular) radians, i rotating the 3 possible planes, and a sign reversal engendering the antiparticle; also power expansion is not applicable here since v = c. Set R_{3x3} ≡ [c_{12}=1= c_{23} = c_{31}, elsewhere 0]; then R x Matrix X = [d_{11}=d_{23}=1 = d_{32}, elsewhere 0, call Matrix Z], and – R^{2} x Matrix X = [e31=1= e22 = e13, elsewhere 0, call Matrix Y]. Projecting the above 3 matrices X, Z, Y onto (x,y),(x,z),(y,z) planes, we arrive at Pauli matrices. The first columns of the 3 matrices, being linear momenta, show semicircular motions from W≡(1,0,0) to N≡(0,1,0) to E≡(1,0,0) to T≡(0,0,1) and back to W, so electron has 4 states in 720°, as evidenced in Feynman III111 with ℏ, not ℏ/2, and subject to SternGerlach test. 
Tuesday, April 16, 2019 3:54PM  4:06PM 
Z08.00003: Algorithm Universe Model for generating Dimensional Features Gregory Marcus Friedlander Space and Energy are the same thing. Time and change are different. These conclusions give rise to a specific mathematical model of space, time and atomic structure. Summary article: Friedlander, J Phys Math 2018, 9:4. 
Tuesday, April 16, 2019 4:06PM  4:18PM 
Z08.00004: Quantumentangled superluminal doublehelix photon produces a relativistic superluminal quantumvortex zitterbewegung electron and positron Richard Gauthier

Tuesday, April 16, 2019 4:18PM  4:30PM 
Z08.00005: Harmonic Triangles Theodore M Lach 2500 years ago, Pythagoras of Samos discovered the harmonic intervals: Octave 1:2, Perfect 5^{th} 2:3, and Perfect 4^{th} 3:4. I extended this concept to the triangle and gave it the name Harmonic Triangle. Consider a Rt Triangle ABC, with B being the Rt angle and AC the hypotenuse. A line from B to line AC, is the height of the Rt Triangle intersecting at D. Then by geometry the geometric mean of AD and DC is equal to the height BD for all angles Theta at C. Only certain values of Theta produce a critical angle that makes the triangle Harmonic. The first of these is Theta = 26.565 degrees, which happens when AD is ½ BD and BD is ½ DC. This is the firstgeneration Harmonic triangle. Similarly, you can construct the triangles for the perfect 5^{th} and the perfect 4^{th}. The perfect 5^{th} has a critical angle of 33.6900 degrees. Now going back to the CBM, we observe that the cube root of a geometric series is also geometric. So, the cube root of the masses determined in that model are also related to each other by the geometric mean. One observes that these cube roots recreates the ratios 1:2, 2:3 and 3:4 which determine the critical angles. So, I contend that this supports the hypothesis made in the CBM and predicts that the masses of the quarks are a function of the radii 
Tuesday, April 16, 2019 4:30PM  4:42PM 
Z08.00006: On a Flavor Symmetrical Mode of Neutrino Oscillation Rasulkhozha S Sharafiddinov, Rasulkhozha S Sharafiddinov The neutrino oscillation and the oldest picture of its building encounters the condition of a unity of flavor and gauge symmetry laws and requires the explanation both from the point of view of a classification of elementary particles with respect to Coperation and from the point of view of neutrino strings. To solve this question, it is desirable to recall at first the lepton and true [1] flavors, the conservation of which unites the two left (right)handed neutrinos in flavorless difermions of Ceven or Codd character. They have no definite mass. Therefore, in conformity with a gauge invariance principle, we conclude that the neutrino oscillations are carried out in the systems of the same vector or axialvector types of neutrino strings without flavor symmetry violation. Thus, to reanalyse the experiments about mixing angles at the new level, one must elucidate the ideas of each of those oscillations which originate, for example, in the systems of quarks and other types of hadrons. But at a given stage we can only add that regardless of the oscillating particle types, their mixing has the unified nature. [1] R.S. Sharafiddinov, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55, 3040 (2016). 
Tuesday, April 16, 2019 4:42PM  4:54PM 
Z08.00007: A Beyond the Standard Model (BSM) Solution using a TwoStep Integrated Physics/Mathematics Methodology Antonio A Colella The SM consists of 16 matter/force particles: six quark matter particles (up, down, charm, strange, top, and bottom); six lepton matter particles (electron, muon, tau, electronneutrino, muonneutrino, and tauneutrino); and four force particles (photon, W/Z’s, gluon, and Higgs). Although the SM is the gold standard of particle physics, it is inadequate because it: defines only a single Higgs force; did not include the graviton, dark matter, dark energy, supersymmetry (SUSY), and super supersymmetry (SSUSY). Via “New Physics” of four BSM constituent theories (superstring, particle creation, Higgs forces or bosons, and spontaneous symmetry breaking), the SM was amplified to Fig. 7 Fundamental SM/SUSY/SSUSY matter/force particles or a conceptual BSM physics step solution. The latter resolved all SM inadequacies and contained 64 fundamental matter/force particles. Atomic/subatomic matter particles (up quark, down quark, electron, electronneutrino, muonneutrino, and tauneutrino) were 5% of our universe’s energy/mass; dark matter (zino, photino, and three Higgsinos) was 26%: and dark energy or the sum of 8 Higgs force energies associated with 8 matter particles (up quark, down quark, electron, electronneutrino, muonneutrino, tauneutrino, zino, and photino was 69%. 
Tuesday, April 16, 2019 4:54PM  5:06PM 
Z08.00008: C.O.P. (coal, oil, power) Dark? Energy, Fluid, Matter, New Clean Energy Process, Seeking Safety and... Jerry A Witt, Jerry A Witt Focus 10yrs in on a Self Contained Clean Energy Process. It’s awesome to see it’s inspired energy source coincides with Modern Physics of Today, finally. And, useful in health and wellness applications it’s point of known origin, thx. I have imagined multiple scenarios which could and can make a Clean Energy Process patentable. “Patenting an idea is not to secure a person’s right to produce, rather limits others from liberties not extended in return”, quotes express the ideology expressed through this readers mind not at or upon. (Quotation Marks, for proper, yet often mixed messaging at times, when properly expressed, as other’s words, can be or not be intent, feelings and intent often muddled). Big Bang, faster than limits met relative to blurred general standards, connected now, and through time, not cancelled. Energy timeless brought into our dimensional reality from Bang silent til molecules and atomic bonds established, understood, conection timeless and still too. Theory indicating a time indication always present, clear. Time curved to r at Black hole, reintroduced in time as energy. 
Follow Us 
Engage
Become an APS Member 
My APS
Renew Membership 
Information for 
About APSThe American Physical Society (APS) is a nonprofit membership organization working to advance the knowledge of physics. 
© 2022 American Physical Society
 All rights reserved  Terms of Use
 Contact Us
Headquarters
1 Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 207403844
(301) 2093200
Editorial Office
1 Research Road, Ridge, NY 119612701
(631) 5914000
Office of Public Affairs
529 14th St NW, Suite 1050, Washington, D.C. 200452001
(202) 6628700