15th APS Topical Conference on Shock Compression of Condensed Matter
Volume 52, Number 8
Sunday–Friday, June 24–29, 2007;
Kohala Coast, Hawaii
Session M4: Geophysics and Planetary Physics
10:30 AM–1:00 PM,
Wednesday, June 27, 2007
Fairmont Orchid Hotel
Room: Plaza II
Chair: Ricky Chau, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Abstract ID: BAPS.2007.SHOCK.M4.1
Abstract: M4.00001 : The Deep Impact Oblique Impact Experiment
10:30 AM–11:00 AM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Peter H. Schultz
(Department of Geological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912-1846)
The Deep Impact experiment represents a unique challenge.
Without being able to see clearly
the final crater, properties of the target requires comparing the
ballistic ejecta
with analytical and theoretical models for crater excavation.
But the appropriate
excavation model needs to be identified first. Consequently, each
critical stage of
cratering observed for the DI collision (initial coupling,
late-stage ejection) is
described and compared with a wide range of laboratory
experimental results. The
early-time flash and vapor plume rapidly evolve along the
trajectory: an initial
faint ``first light'' uprange from the projected point of impact;
a fading source along
the trajectory that moves downrange ($\sim$100-170m) over the
next 0.125s after impact;
gradual brightening over the next 0.62s; and then a sudden
``flash'' (saturated pixels)
around 0.25s after the ``first light.'' This evolution is
consistent with a high-porosity,
layered target, which is also inferred from the high-resolution
imaging of the impact
point. Because of the low impact angle for DI (between
25$^{\circ}$ and 35$^{\circ}$ from the surface
horizontal), changing styles of ejecta with time are mapped out
spatially by the
ballistic ejecta. Such changing styles provide qualitative but
critical clues for
scaling including initial coupling (plume evolution, shallow
versus deep coupling)
and excavation stages (symmetric versus asymmetric, non-radial
rays). Two different
approaches are used to constrain the final crater size: backward
ray traces to the
surface and estimates derived from the total ejected mass from
earth-based telescopic
observations. Ejecta ray traces indicate a diameter of about
175m. The total ejected
mass based on Earth-based observations (107 kg dust and water
ice) should be 50 times
less than the total displaced mass for the crater (neglecting the
contribution by ices).
Based on this (and other considerations), the crater diameter
could be a maximum of 250m.
Nevertheless, the excavated mass observed from the earth (or
other probes) most likely
was derived from a very small fraction (and likely the upper
surface) due to the oblique
trajectory. The crater may very well be a nested crater, i.e., a
deep penetration funnel
surrounded by a shallow excavation crater.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2007.SHOCK.M4.1