APS March Meeting 2015
Volume 60, Number 1
Monday–Friday, March 2–6, 2015;
San Antonio, Texas
Session T48: Focus Session: Physics of Evolutionary and Population Dynamics II
11:15 AM–2:03 PM,
Thursday, March 5, 2015
Room: 217C
Sponsoring
Unit:
DBIO
Chair: Uwe Tauber, Virginia Tech University
Abstract ID: BAPS.2015.MAR.T48.10
Abstract: T48.00010 : Diffusion limited mutualism
1:03 PM–1:39 PM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Kirill Korolev
(Boston University)
Microbes trade diffusible molecules to survive and maintain complex
ecological functions. Physicists have substantially advanced our
understanding of microbial populations, primarily relying on the
evolutionary game theory. Game theory however was developed for higher
organisms and cannot easily describe microbial cooperation, which involves
the exchange of small, highly diffusible molecules. We formulated and solved
a model that accurately represents the physics of diffusion in microbial
colonies. In particular, we discovered a general approach that eliminates
metabolite diffusion and recasts population dynamics in the traditional game
theory framework, but with renormalized parameters.
We applied this approach to the problem of two-way cross-feeding, a common
interaction motif in the microbial world that is the subject of several
experimental studies. Naively one would assume that nutrient diffusion
should facilitate mutualistic interactions in microbial colonies. Indeed,
because microbes are not completely mixed inside a colony, different species
tend to form small domains, and diffusion should facilitate the exchange of
the nutrients between the two cross-feeding species. We, however, find that
nutrient diffusion reduces the strength of mutualism and leads to a phase
transition that makes mutualism impossible.
We analytically compute the critical diffusivity at which mutualism is lost
and find the universality class of the phase transition. The distance to
this phase transition controls the size of the domains formed by the
species, a quantity of prime interest in empirical studies. Finally, we show
that the differences in public good diffusivities affect mutualism only in
the presence of nonlinearities in the public good dynamics. In particular,
fitness nonlinearities suppress mutualism and favor the species producing
nutrients that diffuse more slowly.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2015.MAR.T48.10