APS March Meeting 2015
Volume 60, Number 1
Monday–Friday, March 2–6, 2015;
San Antonio, Texas
Session L48: Focus Session: Physics of Cellular Organization II
8:00 AM–10:48 AM,
Wednesday, March 4, 2015
Room: 217C
Sponsoring
Unit:
DBIO
Chair: S.M. Ali Tabei, University of Northern Iowa
Abstract ID: BAPS.2015.MAR.L48.10
Abstract: L48.00010 : Glycosylases utilize ``stop and go'' motion to locate DNA damage
9:48 AM–10:24 AM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Shane Nelson
(University of Vermont)
Oxidative damage to DNA results in alterations that are mutagenic or even
cytotoxic. Base excision repair is a mechanism that functions to identify
and correct these lesions, and is present in organisms ranging from bacteria
to humans. DNA glycosylases are the first enzymes in this pathway and
function to locate and remove oxidatively damaged bases, and do so utilizing
only thermal energy. However, the question remains of how these enzymes
locate and recognize a damaged base among millions of undamaged bases.
Utilizing fluorescence video microscopy with high spatial and temporal
resolution, we have observed a number of different fluorescently labeled
glycosylases (including bacterial FPG, NEI, and NTH as well as mammalian
MutyH and OGG). These enzymes diffuse along DNA tightropes at approximately
0.01$+$/- 0.005 $\mu$m2/s with binding lifetimes ranging from one second to
several minutes. Chemically induced damage to the DNA substrate causes a
$\sim$ 50{\%} reduction in diffusion coefficients and a
$\sim$ 400{\%} increase in binding lifetimes, while mutation of the
key ``wedge residue'' -- which has been shown to be responsible for damage
detection - results in a 200{\%} increase in the diffusion coefficient.
Utilizing a sliding window approach to measure diffusion coefficients within
individual trajectories, we observe that distributions of diffusion
coefficients are bimodal, consistent with periods of diffusive motion
interspersed with immobile periods. Utilizing a unique chemo-mechanical
simulation approach, we demonstrate that the motion of these glycosylases
can be explained as free diffusion along the helical pitch of the DNA,
punctuated with two different types of pauses: 1) rapid, short-lived pauses
as the enzyme rapidly probes DNA bases to interrogate for damage and, 2)
less frequent, longer lived pauses that reflect the enzyme bound to and
catalytically removing a damaged base. These simulations also indicate that
the wedge residue is critical for interrogation and recognition of damage,
and thus enzymes missing this residue diffuse faster. Similarly, chemically
induced damage increases the frequency with which the enzymes encounter
damaged bases, resulting in slower diffusion.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2015.MAR.L48.10