APS March Meeting 2015
Volume 60, Number 1
Monday–Friday, March 2–6, 2015;
San Antonio, Texas
Session L28: Focus Session: Spin Liquids I
8:00 AM–11:00 AM,
Wednesday, March 4, 2015
Room: 205
Sponsoring
Units:
GMAG DMP
Chair: Roger Melko, University of Waterloo
Abstract ID: BAPS.2015.MAR.L28.13
Abstract: L28.00013 : A liquid-gas transition in a 3D Kitaev model
10:24 AM–11:00 AM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Joji Nasu
(Tokyo Institute of Technology)
Quantum spin liquid (QSL) is an exotic quantum state of matter in insulating
magnets, where long-range ordering is suppressed down to the lowest
temperature. Several experimental candidates of QSL have been recently
nominated thus far. In their characterization, the absence of thermodynamic
anomalies, namely, adiabatic connection from the high-temperature paramagnet
(spin gas), is regarded as a hallmark of QSL. Although adiabatic connection
between liquid and gas is allowed by bypassing the critical end point in
conventional fluids, it is highly nontrivial whether a thermodynamic
transition between QSL and paramagnet exists or not in quantum spin systems.
The issue is crucial not only for theoretical understanding of QSLs but also
for the interpretation of existing and forthcoming experiments. To clarify
this problem, we investigate a three-dimensional extension of the Kitaev
model [1,2,3]. This model is relevant to the recently found Ir oxides
Li$_{\mathrm{2}}$IrO$_{\mathrm{3}}$. The Kitaev model is one of the solvable
quantum spin models, where the ground state is given by gapped and gapless
QSLs, depending on the anisotropy of the interactions. This model can be
rewritten as a free Majorana fermion system coupled with Z$_{\mathrm{2}}$
variables. Using this representation, we perform the Monte Carlo simulation
and analyze the thermodynamic properties. We find that the model exhibits a
finite-temperature phase transition between the QSLs and paramagnet in the
whole parameter range. This result indicates that both gapless and gapped
QSL phases at low temperatures are always distinguished from the
high-temperature paramagnet by a phase transition. We also find that the
difference between QSL and paramagnet comes from the topological nature of
the excitations. This work has been done in collaboration with Y. Motome and
M. Udagawa in Univ. of Tokyo. [1] J. Nasu, M. Udagawa, and Y. Motome, Phys.
Rev. Lett. \textbf{113} 197205 (2014). [2] J. Nasu \textit{et al.}, Phys. Rev. B
\textbf{89} 115125 (2014). [3] J. Nasu, M. Udagawa, and Y. Motome, preprint
(arXiv:1409.4865).
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2015.MAR.L28.13