APS March Meeting 2010
Volume 55, Number 2
Monday–Friday, March 15–19, 2010;
Portland, Oregon
Session T5: Measuring Magnetism at the Nanoscale
2:30 PM–5:30 PM,
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Room: Portland Ballroom 256
Sponsoring
Unit:
FIAP
Chair: Ernesto Marinero, Hitachi Research Center-San Jose
Abstract ID: BAPS.2010.MAR.T5.1
Abstract: T5.00001 : Prospects for Imaging Magnetic Nanoparticles Using a Scanning Squid Microscope*
2:30 PM–3:06 PM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
John Kirtley
(Stanford University)
Magnetic nanoparticles have a number of present and proposed
uses: in the fields of nanobiotechnology for magnetic separation,
magnetic manipulation, magnetic sensing, and in situ heating; for
high density storage in both conventional and patterned media;
and for spintronic devices. Although there are well established
techniques for measuring the magnetic
properties of large numbers of particles, it is
desirable to magnetically image individual nanoparticles
and clusters with small numbers of nanoparticles to determine
such properties as their coercive fields, magnetic moments, and
anisotropy energies. Wernsdorfer and co-workers [1] have shown
that the magnetic reversal fields of small magnetic particles can
be determined using a nanoSQUID. However, in these experiments
nanoparticles were deposited directly on the SQUID. Such a
technique would be difficult to use for the determination of, for
example, the distribution in particle properties of a collection
of particles. Woods and coworkers [2] determined the anisotropy
energy of a film of magnetic particles from SQUID microscope
measurements of the magnetic noise. In these experiments a large
number of particles were included in the region sensed by the
SQUID pickup loop, so that only average properties were
determined. Measurement of the magnetic properties of individual
nanoparticles is a challenge using any scanning probe microscopy,
but is possible with the scanning SQUID microscope. In this talk
I will describe different modes for imaging magnetic
nanoparticles, present simple calculations of the size of signal
expected for these modes as a function of such parameters as the
size and saturation magnetization of the particles, the size of
the pickup loop, and the spacing between the SQUID pickup loop
and the nanoparticle, and compare these signals with the noise
currently and ultimately available in scanning SQUID sensors [3].
I conclude that such
measurements should be possible with the very small pickup loop
(0.6 $\mu$m diameter) nanoSQUIDs that have now been demonstrated
[4]. We have built and operated a high spatial resolution,
variable sample temperature scanning SQUID microscope for imaging
magnetic nanoparticles. I will describe this microscope and
present results on imaging magnetic nanoparticles.
* Work done in collaboration with Beena Kalisky, Lisa Qian, and
Kathryn Moler.
\\[4pt]
[1] W. Wernsdorfer {\it et al.} {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 78},
1791 (1997).
\\[0pt]
[2] S.I. Woods, J.R. Kirtley, S. Sun, and R.H. Koch, {\it Phys.
Rev. Lett.} {\bf 87}, 137205 (2001).
\\[0pt]
[3] J.R. Kirtley, {\it Supercond. Sci. Technol}. {\bf 22}, 064008
(2009).
\\[0pt]
[4] N.C. Koshnick, M.E. Huber, J.A. Bert, C.W. Hicks, J. Large,
H. Edwards, and K.A. Moler, {\it Appl. Phys. Lett.} {\bf 93},
243101 (2007).
*This work was supported by the Center for Probing the Nanoscale (CPN), an NSF NSEC, NSF grant no. PHY-0245897.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2010.MAR.T5.1