APS March Meeting 2010
Volume 55, Number 2
Monday–Friday, March 15–19, 2010;
Portland, Oregon
Session Q28: Focus Session: New Frontiers in Electronic Structure Theory IV
11:15 AM–2:15 PM,
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Room: C124
Sponsoring
Unit:
DCP
Chair: David Sherrill, Georgia Institute of Technology
Abstract ID: BAPS.2010.MAR.Q28.7
Abstract: Q28.00007 : Explicitly-Correlated Electronic-Structure Methods for Single-Reference and Multi-Reference Systems
12:51 PM–1:27 PM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Edward Valeev
(Virginia Tech)
Predictive computation of energy differences and properties
related to them (equilibrium constants, reaction rates,
rovibrational spectra) demand convergent series of
high-level wave function models in combination with
specially-designed basis set sequences. Unfortunately,
the use of practical basis sets results in unacceptably-large
basis set errors. For example, the mean absolute and maximum
basis set error of heats of formations of
small closed and open-shell molecules in the HEAT testset
are 9.1 and 25.2 kJ/mol when using the correlation-consistent
triple-zeta basis set. Reliable predictions of
chemical accuracy (defined as 1 kcal/mol = 4.2 kJ/mol)
clearly requires more extensive basis sets and
computational costs increased by orders of magnitude.
The cause of the large basis set errors is fundamental:
the qualitatively incorrect behavior of the standard wave functions
when electrons approach each other closely.
Although carefully designed basis set sequences
allow to reduce the basis set error of molecular energies by
empirical extrapolation,
such approaches are often not reliable and cannot be easily
extended to
properties.
Explicitly correlated R12 wave function methods
account for the basis set challenge from first principles.
In R12 methods the two-electron basis includes products
$f(r_{ij}) |ij \rangle$,
where $f(r_{ij})$ is a function of an interelectronic
distance that models the short-range correlation of the electrons.
The many-electron integrals that appear in explicitly correlated
methods are simplified by systematic approximations based on the
resolution of the identity (RI).
At the MP2 level the use of R12 approach allows to reduce the
basis set
error by an order of magnitude, with a disproportionately-small
increase in computational cost.
I will first discuss our recent progress in extension of R12 approach
to the highly-accurate coupled-cluster (CC) methods for ground
and excited states.
The rigorous R12 extension of the CC method is formally
straightforward
but the resulting equations are immensely complex and are not
suited for
manual implementation. To derive, manipulate, and implement
these equations we employed an automated compiler that can handle
the more general algebraic structure of the CC-R12 equations,
isolate the special R12 intermediates, factorize the
resulting tensor expressions, and generate efficient computer
codes. Evaluation of the nonstandard two-electron integrals
is also carried out by a high-performance
computer code produced by a specialized compiler.
These developments have allowed us for the first time
to investigate a range of unprecedented ground-state CC-R12 methods
through CCSDTQ-R12. Application of these novel methods
to small polyatomic molecules results in absolute electronic energies
of chemical accuracy and without any extrapolation.
A more practical approach to R12 coupled-cluster methods
is to introduce explicit correlation by perturbation theory.
My group has developed a family of CC-R12 methods
that treat geminal terms alone (CCSD(2)$_{\rm R12}$), or in
conjunction
with triple excitations (CCSD(T)$_{\rm R12}$), in a manner similar
the workings of the ``gold standard'' CCSD(T) method.
The advantage of the perturbative route is that
the standard CC equations are not modified, and
technical changes to the MP2-R12 code are minor.
We demonstrated that the CCSD(T)$_{\rm R12}$ method is a practical
R12 variant of the CCSD(T) method with performance
similar to the rigorous CCSD(T)-R12 counterpart.
For the aforementioned HEAT example,
the use of the CCSD(T)$_{\rm R12}$ method
allows to reduce the basis set error to 2.8 kJ/mol in mean
absolute sense
and to 7.2 kJ/mol at most, all with the same triple-zeta basis set.
Thus, the CCSD(T)$_{\rm R12}$ method with only a triple-zeta
basis set
seems to reach chemical accuracy on average.
I will finally discuss how the R12 approach can be applied
to any electronic state for which low-order reduced density
matrices are available.
This development allowed us to couple the R12
method with the multi-reference configuration-interaction (MR-CI)
in an efficient and robust manner.
Preliminary investigations of
potential energy surfaces of hydrogen fluoride and nitrogen
molecules at the
MRCI singles and doubles indicate that with the universal
R12 correction only a double-zeta basis is necessary to
compute correlation energies of a quadruple-zeta quality, or better.
The proposed R12 correction can in principle be combined with any
single- and multi-reference method in use today.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2010.MAR.Q28.7