2009 APS March Meeting
Volume 54, Number 1
Monday–Friday, March 16–20, 2009;
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Session L3: Fe-based Superconductors: Competing Orders
2:30 PM–4:54 PM,
Tuesday, March 17, 2009
Room: 301/302
Sponsoring
Unit:
DCMP
Chair: Hong Ding, Institute of Physics, CAS
Abstract ID: BAPS.2009.MAR.L3.4
Abstract: L3.00004 : Superconductivity and Magnetism in LaO$_{1-x}$F$_{x}$FeAs
4:18 PM–4:54 PM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Bernd Buechner
(IFW Dresden)
Measuring $^{75}$As, $^{139}$La, and $^{57}$Fe Nuclear Magnetic
Resonance
(NMR) as well as $\mu $SR, transport and thermodynamic properties
we have
determined the phase diagram of LaO$_{1-x}$F$_{x}$AsFe
superconductors
[1-6]. In my talk, I will show experimental studies of the
magnetic ordering
[2, 5], properties of the superconducting state [1, 3, 5] and the
normal
state properties [1, 4, 6] in the superconducting regions of the
phase
diagram. While the temperature dependence of the London
penetration as
determined from $\mu $SR points to an isotropic s wave state [3],
our early
NMR data suggest singlet pairing and nodes of the order parameter
[1].
Extending the NMR work to lower temperatures we find evidence for a
deviation of the T$^{3}$ behaviour of the spin lattice
relaxation, which
would agree with the extended s-wave symmetry suggested in recent
theoretical work. In the paramagnetic normal state, NMR on all
three nuclei
shows that the local electronic susceptibility rises with increasing
temperature. This had led to suggest the presence of a pseudogap,
which I
will discuss in detail. The scaling of all NMR shifts with
respect to the
macroscopic susceptibility indicates that there is no apparent
multiband
effect through preferential hyperfine couplings. Relaxation
measurements
indicate a similar temperature-dependence for (T$_{1}$T)$^{-1}$,
and suggest
that the dynamical susceptibility changes uniformly in q space
with varying
temperature. The transport properties show some striking
similarities to the
findings in cuprates [6] and, finally, susceptibility [4] as well
as NMR
studies point to the antiferromagnetic fluctuations, whose
relevance is also
discussed in many theoretical models of the superconducting pairing
mechanism. In collaboration with Hans-Joachim Grafe, Christian
Hess, R\"udiger Klingeler, G\"unter Behr, Agnieszka Kondrat,
Norman Leps, and Guillaume Lang, IFW Dresden; Hans-Henning
Klauss, TU Dresden; and Hubertus Luetkens, PSI Villigen.
\\[4pt]
References:
\\[0pt]
[1] H.-J. Grafe et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{101}, 047003 (2008)
\\[0pt]
[2] H.-H. Klauss et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{101}, 077005 (2008)
\\[0pt]
[3] H. Luetkens et al., Phys- Rev. Lett. \textbf{101}, 097009 (2008)
\\[0pt]
[4] R. Klingeler et al., arXiv: 0808.0708 (2008)
\\[0pt]
[5] H. Luetkens et al., arXiv: 0806.3533 (2008)
\\[0pt]
[6] C. Hess et al., arXiv: 0811.1601 (2008)
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2009.MAR.L3.4