2008 APS March Meeting
Volume 53, Number 2
Monday–Friday, March 10–14, 2008;
New Orleans, Louisiana
Session P6: Fluid Dynamics and Biology
8:00 AM–11:00 AM,
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
Morial Convention Center
Room: RO4
Sponsoring
Unit:
DFD
Chair: Silas Alben, Georgia Institute of Technology
Abstract ID: BAPS.2008.MAR.P6.1
Abstract: P6.00001 : Depolymerization-driven flow and the crawling of nematode sperm
8:00 AM–8:36 AM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Charles Wolgemuth
(UCONN Health Center)
Cell crawling motility is integral in many biological and
biomedical processes, such as wound healing, cancer metastasis,
and morphogenesis. A complete understanding of the mechanisms
by which cells crawl is still lacking, but it is known to entail
at least three separate physical processes: (i) cytoskeletal
extension at the front of the cell; (ii) adhesion to the
substrate at the cell front and release at the rear; and (iii)
advance of the cell body. In most cells, the cytoskeletal
network is composed of actin. The mechanism by which force is
generated to drive translocation of the cell body is still
debated. Originally, this force was attributed to an actomyosin
system similar to muscle. However, nematode sperm utilize a
cytoskeleton composed of a network of Major Sperm Protein (MSP)
that forms non-polar filaments for which molecular motors have
not been identified. The motility of these cells still exhibits
all three fundamental processes required for standard crawling
motility. Experiments suggest that depolymerization of the
cytoskeletal network is the force-producing mechanism for
pulling up the rear.
In this talk I will present a mechanical model that describes
how depolymerization of the cytoskeleton can drive motility.
This model accounts for both cytoskeletal displacements and
cytsolic (the fluid component of the cell) flow. The model
accurately fits in vitro data using nematode sperm extracts
where depolymerization induces contraction of MSP polymer
bundles. Application of this model to cell crawling produces
testable predictions about how the size and shape of a cell
affect crawling speed. Experiments using {\it Caenorhabditis
elegans} sperm show good agreement with the model predictions.
Interestingly, the model requires that cells are anisotropically
elastic, being more stiff in the direction of motion than
perpendicular to it. A simple physical picture can account for
this anisotropy. The model also predicts that cell speed
increases with anisotropy and with depolymerization rate.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2008.MAR.P6.1