2006 APS March Meeting
Monday–Friday, March 13–17, 2006;
Baltimore, MD
Session Y30: Focus Session: Biopolymers I: Phase Transitions
8:00 AM–11:00 AM,
Friday, March 17, 2006
Baltimore Convention Center
Room: 327
Sponsoring
Units:
DPOLY DBP
Chair: Jose Onuchic, University of California, San Diego
Abstract ID: BAPS.2006.MAR.Y30.2
Abstract: Y30.00002 : The energy landscape for folding and function*
8:36 AM–9:12 AM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Jose Onuchic
(Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, UCSD)
Globally the energy landscape of a folding protein resembles a
partially rough funnel. The local roughness of the funnel
reflects transient trapping of the protein configurations in
local free energy minima. The kinetics of folding is best
considered as a progressive organization of an ensemble of
partially folded structures through which the protein passes
through on its way to the folded structure.
The folding mechanisms for several fast-folding proteins can be
described using an energy landscape theory to set up the
correspondence with simulations of protein minimalist models.
Using these simulations together with analytical theory, we can
learn about good (minimally frustrated) folding sequences and
non-folding (frustrated) sequences. An important idea that
emerges from this theory is that subtle features of the protein
landscape can profoundly affect the apparent mechanism of
folding. Experiments on the dependence of the folding/unfolding
times, and the stability of these proteins to denaturant
concentration and site-directed mutagenesis, and on the early
events of folding allow to infer the global characteristics of
the landscape.
In addition to need to minimize energetic frustration, the
topology of the native fold also plays a major role in the
folding mechanism. Some folding motifs are easier to design than
others suggesting the possibility that evolution not only
selected sequences with sufficiently small energetic frustration
but also selected more easily designable native structures.
Several proteins (such as CI2 and SH3) have sufficiently reduced
energetic frustration) that much of the heterogeneity observed in
their transition state ensemble (TSE) is determined by topology.
Topological effects go beyond the structure of the TSE. The
overall structure of the on-route and off-route (traps)
intermediates for the folding of more complex proteins is also
influenced by topology. Utilizing this theoretical framework,
simulations of minimalist models and computationally-expensive
all-atom simulations, we are now obtaining a quantitative
understanding of the folding problem, which allows for a direct
comparison to a new generation of folding experiments.
Connections between the folding landscape and protein function
will also be discussed.
*Supported by the NSF
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2006.MAR.Y30.2