2006 APS March Meeting
Monday–Friday, March 13–17, 2006;
Baltimore, MD
Session N5: Pake and AIP Industrial Physics Prizes
8:00 AM–11:00 AM,
Wednesday, March 15, 2006
Baltimore Convention Center
Room: 309
Sponsoring
Unit:
FIAP
Chair: Thomas Theis, IBM
Abstract ID: BAPS.2006.MAR.N5.5
Abstract: N5.00005 : MRI from 400 gauss to 1.5 tesla and beyond
10:24 AM–11:00 AM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
William Edelstein
(GE Global Research Center (Retired))
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is arguably the most novel and important
medical imaging modality since the advent of the X-ray. MRI grew out of the
long development of atomic spectroscopy, atomic and molecular beam resonance
and, finally, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) in condensed matter.
The operation and economics of MRI systems depend on the performance of
magnets, pulsed magnetic field gradient windings and rf (radiofrequency)
coils. Physics and physicists have made critical contributions to these
technologies. Superconducting magnets have come to be the magnet of choice.
Magnetic gradient windings present theoretical electromagnetic and practical
challenges.
The need for rf antennas that resonate at high frequencies while surrounding
sizable spatial regions inspired large coils producing uniform rf magnetic
fields while minimizing electric field interactions with the imaging
subject. This development enabled MRI at high magnetic fields. Additionally
it is possible to use arrays of small rf coils to obtain MRI images with the
high signal-to-noise ratio of a small surface coil and the field of view of
a large coil.
We recently investigated the intense acoustic noise (110 dB or more)
produced in MRI scanners. Surprisingly, eddy currents induced in the magnet
cryostat inner bore make a major contribution to this noise. Calculations
indicate that a thin layer of Cu on the outside of the gradient assembly
could substantially decrease eddy currents and help reduce noise.
GE R{\&}D work was focused on the science underlying MRI, MRI technology and
the MRI product. Corporate management sometimes discourages technical
publication related to evolving products because it might help rivals. Our
practice of extensive publication and participation in open scientific
exchange---after filing appropriate patent applications---served as quality
control for company science and technology.
GE conference presentations and journal publications helped establish
technical leadership and determine which ideas were most important. GE
scientists built reputations leading to leadership prominent within the MRI
technical community. Openness underpinned a highly effective development
process that enabled GE to pull ahead of competitors.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2006.MAR.N5.5