2006 APS March Meeting
Monday–Friday, March 13–17, 2006;
Baltimore, MD
Session G26: Focus Session: Trapping of Nanoscale Biological Objects
8:00 AM–11:00 AM,
Tuesday, March 14, 2006
Baltimore Convention Center
Room: 323
Sponsoring
Unit:
DBP
Chair: W. E. Moerner, Stanford University
Abstract ID: BAPS.2006.MAR.G26.7
Abstract: G26.00007 : Tracking Protein-coated Particles in 3D.*
9:36 AM–10:12 AM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Enrico Gratton
(University of California at Irvine)
The utilization of 2-photon microscopy in the field of Cell
Biology is of
increasing importance because it allows imaging of living cells,
including
those systems where UV imaging is not possible due to
photobleaching or
photodamage limitations. We propose a novel approach using 2-photon
excitation based on the use of a scanner to produce an effective
``intensity
trap''. As the particle moves in this trap (note that there is no
force
applied on the particle at the power level we are using for particle
detection), the detection system continuously calculates the
position of the
particle in the trap. As the position of the particle is
calculated with
respect to the trap, the scanner position is moved to minimize the
``modulation'' of the light intensity in the trap. In practice,
we set the
scanner to perform an orbit around the particle in about 1
millisecond. The
sampling rate is chosen such that many points (32 or 64) are
acquired during
the orbit. An FFT (Fast Fourier Transform) is performed on the
points
acquired during one orbit or after a series of orbits. The DC, AC
and phase
of the first harmonic of the FFT are calculated. The value of the
modulation
varies monotonically as the distance of the particle from the
center of the
orbit is increased so that for every value of the modulation we
can estimate
the value of the distance of the particle from the center of the
orbit. The
phase of the first harmonic gives the angular position of the
particle with
respect to the scanner zero phase which is known relative to the lab
coordinates. The effective bandwidth of the tracking system
depends on the
maximum frequency for sinusoidal oscillation of the scanner,
which is about
5 kHz for our galvano-scanner and on the number of photons needed
for
detecting the particle against the noise. Of course, there are other
important considerations. First, if the motion of the particle is
too fast
such that after one orbit the particle moves too far from the new
position
calculated based on the previous orbit, tracking is lost since
the feedback
mechanism is too slow. Therefore, single molecules, which in
water would
move across the PSF in about 0.1 ms, cannot be tracked. We need
at least a
macromolecule the size of a large protein (100kD) or relatively high
viscosity to increase the time a fluorescent particle can be
observed in the
PSF. The second consideration, perhaps the most important, is
that the
particle should not bleach during the length of the tracking.
This is not a
problem for particles made of many fluorophores, such as polystyrene
fluorescent beads, which are also relatively large. Surprisingly,
for
relatively large particles such as viruses, photobleaching did
not occur.
*In collaboration with Valeria Levim, Univeristy of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2006.MAR.G26.7