2006 APS March Meeting
Monday–Friday, March 13–17, 2006;
Baltimore, MD
Session D17: Focus Session: Phase Transitions and Domains in Ferroelectric Nanostructures II
2:30 PM–4:30 PM,
Monday, March 13, 2006
Baltimore Convention Center
Room: 313
Sponsoring
Unit:
FIAP
Chair: Alex Demkov, The University of Texas
Abstract ID: BAPS.2006.MAR.D17.3
Abstract: D17.00003 : Domain Structures in Nano-Toroids and Ultra-Thin Single Crystals*
2:54 PM–3:30 PM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Marty Gregg
(Queen's University Belfast)
Rationalisation of the formation of domain structures, in
ferroics of
limited dimensions, has been a topic of interest since the
1940's [1], with
early work, specifically in ferroelectrics, in the 1950's [2].
Experimental
studies at that time primarily involved domain investigations
using optical
microscopy, on samples down to the order of hundreds of
microns. More modern
studies, extending domain research into the thin and ultrathin
film regime
[3], suggest that our understanding of certain aspects of
domain behaviour
remain relatively unchanged, despite the intervening decades.
This might
imply that reduction of scales into the nanometre range will
not reveal
anything new or interesting in ferroelectric domain research.
In this talk, we hope to illustrate that this is not the case.
We describe
results from two recent research programmes on the
characterisation of
ferroelectric domain structures in single crystal BaTiO$_{3}$
(BTO) using
Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy. In both studies
sample
preparation was performed using a Focused Ion Beam Microscope
(FIB).
In the first study, the domain periodicity has been measured as
a function
of thickness of parallel-walled BTO slabs from several hundred
nanometres
down to $\sim $50nm. Early work [2] suggested that the domain
width should
vary as the square root of slab thickness, and this is
consistent with our
data. However, we find, in plotting data from several works on
different
ferroelectric materials, with differing surface boundary
conditions, across
six decades in thickness, that all data lie on the \textit
{same} parent function, with
the \textit{same} constants of proportionality. This is totally
unexpected, as the
proportionality constants should be material and surface
boundary state
dependent. We suspect that this reveals fundamental aspects in
the physics
of ferroelectric domain formation that will be discussed.
The second study was motivated by modelling done in 1994 by
Gorbatsevich and
Kopaev [4] and more recently by Fu and Bellaiche [5] and
Naumov, Bellaiche
and Fu [6]. Here, the influence of depolarization fields at
ferroelectric
surfaces were found to create polarization vortex structures
when the
ferroelectrics were sufficiently small. In toroidal shapes,
Gorbatsevich and
Kopaev even envisioned ordering of the vortices to produce
nanoscale
ferroelectric `solenoids'. We have used the FIB to make
toroidal structures
and have characterized their domain morphologies. At the time
of writing,
only conventional domain behaviour has been observed down to
scales of the
order of $\sim $100nm. However, results on smaller scales to be
performed
over the next few months will be described, as well as the
novel imaging
techniques we intend to use to probe for the ferroelectric
vortices.
[1] C. Kittel, Physical Review, \textbf{70}, 965 (1946)
[2] T. Mitsui and J. Furuichi, Physical Review, \textbf{90},
193 (1953)
[3] S. K. Streiffer \textit{et al.} Phys. Rev Lett. \textbf
{89}, 067601 (2002)
[4] A. A. Gorbatsevich {\&} Yu V. Kopaev, Ferroelectrics \textbf
{161}, 321
(1994)
[5] I. Naumov \textit{et al.} Nature \textbf{432}, 737 (2004)
[6] H. Fu and L. Bellaiche, Physical Review Letters, \textbf
{91}, 257601
(2003)
*Authors acknowledge the EPSRC and NanotecNI for finacial support
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2006.MAR.D17.3