2006 APS March Meeting 
Monday–Friday, March 13–17, 2006;
Baltimore, MD
Session G26: Focus Session: Trapping of Nanoscale Biological Objects
8:00 AM–11:00 AM, 
Tuesday, March 14, 2006
Baltimore Convention Center 
Room: 323
Sponsoring
Unit: 
DBP
Chair: W. E. Moerner, Stanford University
Abstract ID: BAPS.2006.MAR.G26.7
Abstract: G26.00007 : Tracking Protein-coated Particles in 3D.*
9:36 AM–10:12 AM
Preview Abstract
  
  Abstract  
Author:
Enrico Gratton
(University of California at Irvine)
The utilization of 2-photon microscopy in the field of Cell
Biology is of 
increasing importance because it allows imaging of living cells,
including 
those systems where UV imaging is not possible due to
photobleaching or 
photodamage limitations. We propose a novel approach using 2-photon 
excitation based on the use of a scanner to produce an effective
``intensity 
trap''. As the particle moves in this trap (note that there is no
force 
applied on the particle at the power level we are using for particle 
detection), the detection system continuously calculates the
position of the 
particle in the trap. As the position of the particle is
calculated with 
respect to the trap, the scanner position is moved to minimize the 
``modulation'' of the light intensity in the trap. In practice,
we set the 
scanner to perform an orbit around the particle in about 1
millisecond. The 
sampling rate is chosen such that many points (32 or 64) are
acquired during 
the orbit. An FFT (Fast Fourier Transform) is performed on the
points 
acquired during one orbit or after a series of orbits. The DC, AC
and phase 
of the first harmonic of the FFT are calculated. The value of the
modulation 
varies monotonically as the distance of the particle from the
center of the 
orbit is increased so that for every value of the modulation we
can estimate 
the value of the distance of the particle from the center of the
orbit. The 
phase of the first harmonic gives the angular position of the
particle with 
respect to the scanner zero phase which is known relative to the lab 
coordinates. The effective bandwidth of the tracking system
depends on the 
maximum frequency for sinusoidal oscillation of the scanner,
which is about 
5 kHz for our galvano-scanner and on the number of photons needed
for 
detecting the particle against the noise. Of course, there are other 
important considerations. First, if the motion of the particle is
too fast 
such that after one orbit the particle moves too far from the new
position 
calculated based on the previous orbit, tracking is lost since
the feedback 
mechanism is too slow. Therefore, single molecules, which in
water would 
move across the PSF in about 0.1 ms, cannot be tracked. We need
at least a 
macromolecule the size of a large protein (100kD) or relatively high 
viscosity to increase the time a fluorescent particle can be
observed in the 
PSF. The second consideration, perhaps the most important, is
that the 
particle should not bleach during the length of the tracking.
This is not a 
problem for particles made of many fluorophores, such as polystyrene 
fluorescent beads, which are also relatively large. Surprisingly,
for 
relatively large particles such as viruses, photobleaching did
not occur.
*In collaboration with Valeria Levim, Univeristy of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2006.MAR.G26.7