Bulletin of the American Physical Society
77th Annual Gaseous Electronics Conference
Monday–Friday, September 30–October 4 2024; San Diego, California
Session FT1: Modeling & Simulation I
8:00 AM–9:30 AM,
Tuesday, October 1, 2024
Room: Brickstones
Chair: Andrew Gibson, Ruhr University Bochum
Abstract: FT1.00003 : Assessment of common approximations in low-temperature plasma modelling using MC simulations*
8:30 AM–9:00 AM
Presenter:
Tiago Cunha Dias
(University of Michigan)
Authors:
Tiago Cunha Dias
(University of Michigan)
Gonçalo A Cardoso
(Instituto de Plasmas e Fusão Nuclear, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa 1049-001, Lisboa, Portugal)
Vasco Guerra
(Instituto de Plasmas e Fusão Nuclear, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa 1049-001, Lisboa, Portugal)
Electron kinetics is often addressed by expanding the electron Boltzmann equation (EBE) over the velocity space under the two-term approximation. We demonstrate that this approximation breaks down at high E/N due to increased anisotropy, a known issue that should be emphasized. Moreover, most EBE solvers assume isotropic scattering for all collision types. We underline that this assumption is not always correct and can significantly impact the accuracy of the results, using rotational collisions in H2O vapor as an example.
Space and time dependencies of electron kinetics are usually described under one of two assumptions: the local-field approximation (LFA), which equates the solution of electron kinetics to the steady-state calculation with the local and instantaneous E/N; or the local-energy approximation (LEA), which includes an equation for the local mean energy. Here, we focus on time-locality to assess the impact of the LFA and LEA on the modelling of NPDs. Our analysis of electron relaxation in various gases and pressures reveals that LEA significantly outperforms LFA, and should be preferred when a fully kinetic description is unavailable. Lastly, we illustrate how electron energy relaxation after ns pulses differs when collisions between charged particles are included, a commonly overlooked aspect.
*IPFN activities were supported by the Portuguese FCT, under projects UIDB/50010/2020 (https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDB/50010/2020), UIDP/50010/2020 (https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDP/50010/2020), LA/P/0061/2020 (https://doi.org/10.54499/LA/P/0061/2020).
Follow Us |
Engage
Become an APS Member |
My APS
Renew Membership |
Information for |
About APSThe American Physical Society (APS) is a non-profit membership organization working to advance the knowledge of physics. |
© 2024 American Physical Society
| All rights reserved | Terms of Use
| Contact Us
Headquarters
1 Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740-3844
(301) 209-3200
Editorial Office
100 Motor Pkwy, Suite 110, Hauppauge, NY 11788
(631) 591-4000
Office of Public Affairs
529 14th St NW, Suite 1050, Washington, D.C. 20045-2001
(202) 662-8700