62nd Annual Gaseous Electronics Conference
Volume 54, Number 12
Tuesday–Friday, October 20–23, 2009;
Saratoga Springs, New York
Session FT1: Capacitively-Coupled Plasmas I
8:00 AM–9:30 AM,
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Saratoga Hilton
Room: Ballroom 1
Chair: Amy Wendt, University of Wisconsin
Abstract ID: BAPS.2009.GEC.FT1.1
Abstract: FT1.00001 : The electrical asymmetry effect in capacitive discharges
8:00 AM–8:30 AM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Uwe Czarnetzki
(Institute for Plasma and Atomic Physics, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany)
One of the major demands in plasma processing has always been the
independent control of ion energy and ion flux. Dual-frequency
capacitive
discharges with one low and one typically an order of magnitude
higher
frequency are one of the concepts presently applied in industry.
However,
recent investigations have shown that there is in fact a coupling
between
the two frequency components that limits independent control by
the two RF
powers. Here, a novel concept is introduced based on the electrical
asymmetry effect (EAE) that provides simple and stable control of
ion energy
and flux in an almost ideally independent way [1]. Also here two RF
frequencies are applied but with the second frequency being
exactly the
second harmonic of the first and with a fixed but controllable
phase. This
phase is the control parameter for the ion energy that changes
approximately
linearly with the phase. Geometrically symmetric discharges can
be made
effectively asymmetric with one electrode showing a higher sheath
potential
than the other. Choosing the proper phase allows then to reverse the
situation or to make the discharge symmetric. In geometrically
asymmetric
discharges the wall potential can be raised or lowered. When
tuning the
phase, the flux stays approximately constant and its absolute
value can be
set with the RF amplitudes. The concept of the EAE is developed
and analyzed
by 1) an analytical model, 2) a hydrodynamic and Monte-Carlo (MC)
simulation, 3) a self consistent PIC/MC simulation, and 4) an
experimental
verification in a laboratory experiment. All four approaches show
excellent
agreement and confirm the above advantages. The technique has found
successful application already in an industrial reactor for large
area solar
cell production (Leybold Optics). Compared to the standard single
frequency
case at 13.56 MHz the silicon deposition rate was easily more
than doubled
and the homogeneity improved.
\\[4pt]
[1] Brian G. Heil, U. Czarnetzki, R. P. Brinkmann, T.
Mussenbrock, JPhysD: Appl. Phys. 42, 165202 (2008)
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2009.GEC.FT1.1