Bulletin of the American Physical Society
66th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics
Monday–Friday, October 7–11, 2024; Atlanta, Georgia
Session GP12: Poster Session III:
Low Temperature Plasmas
Fundamental Plasma Physics I: computation, boundaries
Fundamental Plasma Physics II: dusty, diagnostics
MFE Measurement and Diagnostics Techniques, Technology, and Edge and Pedestal Physics
9:30 AM - 12:30 PM
Tuesday, October 8, 2024
Hyatt Regency
Room: Grand Hall West
Abstract: GP12.00133 : Active Impurity Control in ELM-absent H-mode Plasmas via On-Demand ELM Triggering with Pellet Injection*
Presenter:
Zhen Sun
(Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory)
Authors:
Zhen Sun
(Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory)
Rajesh Maingi
(Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory)
Ling Zhang
(Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences)
Yuzhong Qian
(ASIPP)
Xin Lin
(ASIPP)
Kevin L Tritz
(Johns Hopkins University)
Yifeng Wang
(ASIPP)
Alessandro Bortolon
(Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory)
Robert A. Lunsford
(Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory)
Ahmed Diallo
(Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory)
Alexander Nagy
(Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory)
Guizhong Zuo
(ASIPP)
Xianzu Gong
(Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences)
Jiansheng Hu
(ASIPP)
Collaboration:
EAST team
ELM suppression was achieved with a low-recycling wall by Li coating or active boron powder injection. Robust ELM triggering was obtained with 0.9±0.1mm diameter lithium granules, achieving a triggering efficiency of ~100%. The triggered ELM frequency ranged from 5-200Hz, depending on the pellet injection frequency and plasma conditions. Core radiation from heavy impurities, dominated by W, decreased by up to 50%, and the H98 factor increased from 0.87 to 1.12 after lithium granule injection.
Initially, substantially reduced-size ELMs were triggered, followed by a transition to a mixed ELM phase with intermittent large ELMs comparable to spontaneous ELMs. The particle flux from the triggered large ELMs impacted a wide spatial region of the outer target. The W flushing efficiency for the smaller, irregular pellet-induced ELMs can be evaluated from fast bolometry and SXR measurements. No statistically significant difference in the W flushing efficiency between pellet-triggered and natural ELMs has emerged. ELM-sputtered impurity influxes, determined from visible divertor spectroscopy, can be compared among ELM types.
*This work is supported by the US Department of Energy Contracts DE-AC02-09CH11466.
Follow Us |
Engage
Become an APS Member |
My APS
Renew Membership |
Information for |
About APSThe American Physical Society (APS) is a non-profit membership organization working to advance the knowledge of physics. |
© 2024 American Physical Society
| All rights reserved | Terms of Use
| Contact Us
Headquarters
1 Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740-3844
(301) 209-3200
Editorial Office
100 Motor Pkwy, Suite 110, Hauppauge, NY 11788
(631) 591-4000
Office of Public Affairs
529 14th St NW, Suite 1050, Washington, D.C. 20045-2001
(202) 662-8700