Bulletin of the American Physical Society
66th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics
Monday–Friday, October 7–11, 2024; Atlanta, Georgia
Session BM11: Mini-Conference: Digital Twins for Fusion Research I
9:30 AM–12:30 PM,
Monday, October 7, 2024
Hyatt Regency
Room: International South
Chair: Raffi Nazikian, General Atomics
Abstract: BM11.00009 : Taking it to the next level: Managing complexity in the fusion plasma control system*
11:30 AM–11:45 AM
Presenter:
Marco d Baar
Authors:
Marco d Baar
Matthijs van Berkel
(FOM Institute DIFFER)
Torben F Beernaert
(NWO institute DIFFER)
Dinesh Krishnamoorthy
(Eindhoven University of Technology)
Hari Varadarajan
(Eindhoven University of Technology)
Pascal Etman
(Eindhoven University of Technology)
Collaborations:
Eindhoven University of Technology, NWO institute DIFFER
The framework is demonstrated for ITER, resulting in a fully traceable graph model which suggests that the system can be organized into five distinct groups: Heating and current drive, magnetic configuration, burn dynamics, transport and exhaust, and plasma–wall interaction. All couplings between groups are made apparent in the DSM. Although ITER features specific actuators and sensors, these groups appear common for magnetically confined fusion devices.
The emerging structure highlights a structure of relatively independent control domains, that are weakly coupled. Model Predictive Control (MPC) has emerged as a strong candidate for plasma control in fusion devices owing to its ability to manage varying actuator and state constraints. We have derived MPCs for different domains like density, current density and temperature and exhaust control.
State-of-theart controllers are designed to operate within their designated domains, tracking their own reference signals without explicitly considering interactions with other controllers. Such a decentralized approach, is often suboptimal and can potentially fail to stabilize the overall interconnected system. Taking a systems level perspective, this strongly suggest a cooperative control strategy to account for the interaction between different domain-specific controllers. By extending the cost functions of the MPCs to incorporate interdomain coordination, we can achieve pareto optimal performance.
*-Eurofusion, WP Diagnostics and Control- Stichting Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO), recipient DIFFER- ITER IO (contract No 4300002009), recipient DIFFER European Union via the Euratom Research and Training Programme (Grant Agreement No 101052200), recipient EUROfusion
Follow Us |
Engage
Become an APS Member |
My APS
Renew Membership |
Information for |
About APSThe American Physical Society (APS) is a non-profit membership organization working to advance the knowledge of physics. |
© 2024 American Physical Society
| All rights reserved | Terms of Use
| Contact Us
Headquarters
1 Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740-3844
(301) 209-3200
Editorial Office
100 Motor Pkwy, Suite 110, Hauppauge, NY 11788
(631) 591-4000
Office of Public Affairs
529 14th St NW, Suite 1050, Washington, D.C. 20045-2001
(202) 662-8700