41st Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics
Volume 55, Number 5
Tuesday–Saturday, May 25–29, 2010;
Houston, Texas
Session B1: Atomic and Molecular Physics in Early Universe
10:30 AM–12:30 PM,
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Room: Imperial East
Chair: Daniel Savin, Columbia University
Abstract ID: BAPS.2010.DAMOP.B1.3
Abstract: B1.00003 : Low-Energy Mutual Neutralization Studies for Early Universe Hydrogen Chemistry*
11:30 AM–12:00 PM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Xavier Urbain
(Universite Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium)
Low-energy interactions between light ions, as they occur in low
density plasmas, are ideally studied under merged-beam
conditions. This was the motivation for building the dual-source
setup in operation at UCL, Louvain-la-Neuve, since the early
eighties. Although initially developed for the study of charge
exchange~[1], mutual neutralization and transfer ionization, this
machine has produced a host of total cross section measurements
for a wide variety of associative ionization and other reactive
processes involving charged reactants, from H$^+$ to CO$^+$, in
collision with H$^-$, D$^-$, C$^-$ and O$^-$~[2].
A recent paper by Glover et al.~[3] has revived the interest for
mutual neutralization studies, by stressing the need of the
astrophysical community for a precise determination of the
low-energy cross section of the H$^+$/H$^-$ reaction. The mutual
neutralization acts as a sink for negative ions which otherwise
dominate the primordial formation of H$_2$ by associative
detachment with ground state H. Absolute measurements in the
range 5 meV to 5 eV are needed to rule out earlier experimental
work~[4] contradicting the most recent theoretical
predictions~[5]. Our setup is currently modified to incorporate
coincident imaging techniques, giving access to differential
cross sections besides the branching among accessible neutral
channels. Mutual neutralization reactions of H$^-$ with H$_2^+$
and H$_3^+$ will also be investigated, for the role they play in
laboratory plasmas~[6].\\
[4pt] [1] S. Sz\"ucs, M. Karemera, M. Terao, and F. Brouillard,
\emph{J. Phys. B} \textbf{17}, 1613 (1983).\\
[0pt] [2] E. A. Naji et al., \emph{J. Phys. B} \textbf{31}, 4887
(1998), A. Le Padellec et al., \emph{J. Chem. Phys.},
\textbf{124}, 154304 (2006) and references therein.\\
[0pt] [3] S. C. Glover, D. W. Savin, and A.-K. Jappsen ,
\emph{Astrophys. J.} \textbf{640}, 553 (2006). \\
[0pt] [4] J. Moseley, W. Aberth, and J. R. Peterson, \emph{Phys.
Rev. Lett.} \textbf{24}, 435 (1970).\\
[0pt] [5] M. Stenrup, {\AA}. Larson, and N. Elander, \emph{Phys. Rev.
A} \textbf{79}, 012713 (2009).\\
[0pt] [6] M. J. J. Eerden et al., \emph{Phys. Rev. A}
\textbf{51}, 3362 (1995).
*This work is supported by the F.R.S.-FNRS under I.I.S.N. contract no. 4.4.503.02
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2010.DAMOP.B1.3