38th Annual Meeting of the Division of Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics
Volume 52, Number 7
Tuesday–Saturday, June 5–9, 2007;
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Session A1: Plenary Prize Session
8:00 AM–9:48 AM,
Wednesday, June 6, 2007
TELUS Convention Centre
Room: Macleod BCD
Chair: T. Gay, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Abstract ID: BAPS.2007.DAMOP.A1.2
Abstract: A1.00002 : Broida Prize Talk: Stable and Accurate Single-Atom Optical Clocks*
8:36 AM–9:12 AM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
James Bergquist
(APS)
The potential for high stability and accuracy of optical clocks
based on
narrow transitions of single ions has begun to be realized [1-3].
At NIST,
we have constructed and are operating two single-ion optical
clocks; one
based on the $^{2}$S$_{1/2}$ ($F$ = 0) $\leftrightarrow \quad
^{2}$D$_{5/2}$ ($F$ = 2,
$m_{F} = 0)$ electric-quadrupole transition ($\lambda $ = 282 nm,
$\nu $ = 1.064
PHz) of a single, laser-cooled $^{199}$Hg$^{+}$ ion held in a
cryogenic rf
Paul trap, and one based on the $^{1}$S$_{0} \quad
\leftrightarrow \quad ^{3}$P$_{0}$
intercombination line ($\lambda $ = 267 nm, $\nu $ = 1.124 PHz)
of a single
$^{27}$Al$^{+}$ ion held in a linear trap [4]. The burden of
cooling, state
preparation and state detection of the Al$^{+}$ ion are borne by an
auxiliary Be$^{+}$ ion using quantum logic methods [5]. In a recent
comparison of these two standards, we have achieved a relative
fractional
frequency instability of less than 7 $\times $ 10$^{-15 }(\tau
$/s)$^{-1/2}$, reaching 4 $\times $ 10$^{-17}$ in 30 000 s. We
have also
compared the frequency of the Hg$^{+}$ optical clock to that of
the cesium
fountain standard NIST-F1, for which we obtained fractional
frequency
inaccuracies below 10$^{-15}$. Repeated measurements of the
frequency ratios
of the clock transitions of all three standards provide intriguing
possibilities for laboratory tests of fundamental physics, such
as testing
for the ``constancy'' of the fundamental constants. We will
report the
results of measurements conducted over the course of five years
and discuss
the implications of these results as a constraint to present-day
temporal
variation of the constants [6].
\newline
\newline
\textbf{References}
\newline
[1] H.S. Margolis \textit{et al., }Science \textbf{306}, 1355 (2004).
\newline
[2] T. Schneider, E. Peik, and Chr. Tamm, Phys. Rev. Lett.
\textbf{94},
230801 (2005).
\newline
[3] W.H. Oskay \textit{et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{97},
020801 (2006).
\newline
[4] P.O. Schmidt \textit{et al., }Science \textbf{309}, 749 (2005).
\newline
[5] D.J. Wineland \textit{et al.}, \textit{Proc. 6th Symposium on
Frequency Standards and Metrology, }P. Gill, ed. (World
Scientific, Singapore, 2002) pp.
361-368.
\newline
[6] T. M. Fortier \textit{et al.,} Phys. Rev. Lett. accepted for
publication (2007).
*Supported by ONR, DTO, and NIST.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2007.DAMOP.A1.2