Session T07: FHP Essay Contest Winners

Live

A. Einstein's most famous dictum ``God does not play dice'' has endorsed, especially among physicists, the indissoluble image of this great physicist as the champion of determinism. Also D. Bohm, who was indeed the first to provide a deterministic interpretation of quantum mechanics, is welcomed as the savior of determinism among those who regarded indeterminism in quantum physics as an unacceptable feature to be amended. I will show that, while Einstein and Bohm both pursued indeed a deterministic description of quantum mechanics, their philosophical concern was in fact primarily realism and not determinism. Their alleged adamant committment to determinism is based on a long-lasting misleading narrative and it should therefore be greatly scaled down.   

Live

In this talk we will trace the conceptual history of micro- and macroscopicity in the context of physical science. By focusing on three distinct episodes spanning five centuries, we show the scientific and philosophical meanings of this antonym pair, despite never being far from “the small” and “the large,” have been evolving as the frontier of science advances. We analyze the intellectual and material impetus for these movements, and conclude that this conceptual history reflects the changing interaction between the natural world and humankind.   

Live

Throughout the history of the field of Physics, there is a myriad of untold stories whose details have been eroded by time that are integral to shaping the field today. One such historical gem is the story of the 19$^{\mathrm{th}}$ century physicist Lewis Howard Latimer, the African American collaborator of Thomas Edison and primary contributor to the invention of the lightbulb. During one of the most tumultuous periods in American history, at the crossroads of segregation, racism, classism, and elitism, Lewis Latimer's rise from the son of a slave to an Edison Pioneer, one of the founding members of the modern Electric Lighting Industry, has been long overshadowed by racial scars more-often associated with the post-emancipation era. As a result, the existing records of Latimer are scarce and in somewhat poor agreement on important specifics concerning his relations to the Edison Pioneers, greatly inhibiting the accessibility of his story to broader audiences. Presented here is an accessible, encompassing, and well-supported representation of Lewis Latimer and an examination of the collaboration of the Edison Pioneers that transcends racial and societal barriers, which was extremely rare for the time. This collaboration is a historical testament to physics as an institutional discipline as well as a diverse community of like-minded scholars viewing the world through the same lens. By examining the roots of the community culture in the context of early influences like Lewis Latimer, we can better inform our present-day practices of facilitating an innovative and inclusive fellowship of physicists.