Bulletin of the American Physical Society
APS April Meeting 2019
Volume 64, Number 3
Saturday–Tuesday, April 13–16, 2019; Denver, Colorado
Session T08: Gamma-ray Bursts and Supernovae |
Hide Abstracts |
Sponsoring Units: DAP Chair: Judy Rascusin, NASA GSFC Room: Sheraton Governor's Square 10 |
Monday, April 15, 2019 3:30PM - 3:42PM |
T08.00001: On-orbit operation and gamma-ray burst observations with the CALET Gamma-ray Burst Monitor Yuta Kawakubo The CALorimetric Electron Telescope (CALET) includes a Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (CGBM) to enhance the gamma-ray observations of the calorimeter, the main CALET detector. CGBM consists of two kinds of scintillation detectors, the Hard X-ray Monitor (HXM) consisting of LaBr3(Ce) and the Soft Gamma-ray Monitor (SGM) consisting of BGO. Together, the two detectors cover the X-ray/gamma-ray energy range 7 keV - 20 MeV. CGBM has observed gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) since October 2015. So far, CGBM has detected ~140 GRBs. The fraction of long and short GRBs are ~90% and ~10%. In this paper, we describe the current operational status of CGBM, the GRB analysis results including temporal and spectral analysis, and the search for gravitational wave counterparts. |
Monday, April 15, 2019 3:42PM - 3:54PM |
T08.00002: The Search for >100 GeV Photons from Gamma Ray Bursts with HAWC Matthew M Rosenberg To date, no photons above 100 GeV have been detected from a Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB). The detection or improved limits on this high energy emission would play an important role in constraining GRB emission models. The High Altitude Water Cherenkov (HAWC) observatory is well suited to study GRB spectra above 100 GeV; it is sensitive to the extensive air showers produced by ~0.1-100 TeV photons, and with its large instantaneous field of view (~2sr) and high duty cycle HAWC is capable of observing the prompt emission of tens of GRBs per year. We present the results of recent efforts to enhance HAWC's 0.1-1 TeV sensitivity through improvements to its extensive air shower reconstruction algorithms and discuss their impact on HAWC's analysis of the >100 GeV gamma-ray emission of known GRBs. |
Monday, April 15, 2019 3:54PM - 4:06PM |
T08.00003: Radio Loud and Quiet Gamma-ray Bursts. Nicole M Lloyd-Ronning We present recent results on the dichotomy of long GRBs with and without radio afterglows, showing that the two populations exhibit significantly different properties: those with a radio radio afterglow are significantly longer in prompt (gamma-ray) duration, are more energetic in isotropic energy emitted, show the presence of very high (>10 GeV) gamma-ray emission, and possibly exhibit an anti-correlation between prompt duration and redshift. We discuss these results in terms of GRB progenitor systems. In addition, we put constraints on magnetic fields and black hole masses of both short and long gamma-ray bursts assuming a Blandford-Znajek process powers the GRB jet, and discuss the implications this has on the properties of their progenitors. |
Monday, April 15, 2019 4:06PM - 4:18PM |
T08.00004: Fermi Observations of High Energy Emission from GRB 190114C Daniel Kocevski Synchrotron radiation from shock accelerated electrons has been well established as the source of the broadband afterglow emission accompanying gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). The relativistic electrons producing this emission are expected to also produce synchrotron self-compton (SSC) emission, yet no convincing evidence has ever been found for such an emission component. Late-time detections at GeV energies by the Fermi Large Area Telescocpe (LAT) have been shown to be consistent with the high energy extension of afterglow emission, without the need for SSC to explain most LAT detections. The detection of very high energy emission in GRB 190114C by Fermi LAT and MAGIC is now the first conclusive detection of this elusive emission component and may shed further light on the physics of GRB afterglows. We will review the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) and LAT observations of GRB 190114C and discuss their implications for relativistic shock physics, future very high energy observatories, and possible constraints on the extra-galactic background light. |
Monday, April 15, 2019 4:18PM - 4:30PM |
T08.00005: Studying Type Ia Supernovae Progenitor Parameters Sudeshna Chakraborty, Peter Hoeflich We analyze large sets of light curve data, study intrinsic primary parameter variations and obtain secondary parameter variations using monochromatic differential analysis for SNe Ia. We remap inhomogeneous data sets into a homogeneous data set centered in time and magnitude space and get the external, primary and secondary LC parameters of individual objects. We use photometry of SNe Ia observed by Carnegie Supernova Project and investigate the presence of model based differential LC signatures of main sequence mass variation of progenitor stars, central density variation of the WD and metallicity variation in the progenitors. The V band gives the highest accuracy in the calculations, is insensitive to metallicity and also the most stable for differential creation, as the differentials are stable with respect to the uncertainties in the primary parameters of SNe pairs. Our analysis reduces the residuals from 0.2m to 0.02m . Most of the SNe in our sample have main sequence masses in the upper range of the possible main sequence mass value for SNe Ia progenitors. This indicates that progenitor properties put constrains on the delay time of the star formation. The central density distribution shows that the SNe originates from progenitors with a wide range of central densities. |
Monday, April 15, 2019 4:30PM - 4:42PM |
T08.00006: Adapting Wavelet-based Techniques to Photometrically Classify Cosmological Samples of Supernova Linoy Kotler, Gautham Narayan The Pan-STARRS Medium Deep Survey hosted at the Space Telescope Science Institute is the best source of archival multi-band photometry prior to the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST). Working with a multi-faceted classification pipeline, called SNMachine, we classified different supernovae based on their light curves. We first trained a classifier, named ‘Random Forest’, on simulated data, for which the different types of the supernovae were known, and then applied the classifier to real data, using the largest homogeneous sample of photometric SNIa. This made it possible to determine the probability of each supernova to be classified as type Ia. The classified sample was then used to construct a Hubble diagram in order to measure the rate of expansion of the universe, as well as the equation of state of dark energy. |
Monday, April 15, 2019 4:42PM - 4:54PM |
T08.00007: Detect Supernova Neutrinos with DarkSide-20k LAr TPC Ziping Ye Simulations of core collapse supernovae have undergone great progress in the last decade, yet detections of supernova neutrinos are needed to test these theoretical models. The neutronization burst has yet to be observed; the mechanism that triggers the explosion needs to be tested by observation. In addition, core collapse supernovae provide opportunities to study some fundamental properties of neutrinos, including its absolute mass and mass hierarchy. We report here that DarkSide-20k LAr TPC can play an important and unique role in such observation. It detects neutrinos via coherent elastic neutrino nucleus scattering (CEvNS) which is neutral current interaction and flavor blind. For a typical supernova at a distance of 10 kpc, the 39 tonne LAr TPC can detect about 200 - 300 neutrino events. The supernova neutrino spectrum and the total energy emitted can be measured independent of flavor oscillation. The background level in DarkSide-20k LAr TPC is low, allowing good sensitivity for many measurements. |
Monday, April 15, 2019 4:54PM - 5:06PM |
T08.00008: Comparison between State-of-the-Art supernova simulations and the Notre Dame-Livermore supernova code Luca Boccioli, Grant James Mathews, MacKenzie Warren, In-Saeng Suh, Miguel Correa In recent work [1] a comparison of many spherical core-collapse supernova (CCSN) simulation codes was made for the same 20 Mʘ, solar metallicity progenitor based upon the initial model of [2]. The nuclear equation of state adopted is the SFHo from [3]. In this talk we summarize a comparison of the Notre Dame-Livermore (NDL) general-relativistic CCSN simulation code with the results presented in [1], using the same progenitor and equation of state. Our input neutrino interactions, however, differ from those adopted in the benchmark study. We find that the hydrodynamic aspects of the simulation, including shock evolution and proto-neutron star formation, agree well with the benchmark cases. Not surprisingly, however, there are differences in the emergent neutrino light curve that can be traced to differences in the fundamental neutrino physics employed. In this talk we will analyze these differences, suggesting where future improvements may be required in the supernova simulations. [1] O’Connor et al. (2018), J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 45 104001 [2] Woosley & Heger (2007) Phys. Rep. 442 269–83 [3] Steiner et al. (2013) Astrophys. J. 774 17 |
Follow Us |
Engage
Become an APS Member |
My APS
Renew Membership |
Information for |
About APSThe American Physical Society (APS) is a non-profit membership organization working to advance the knowledge of physics. |
© 2023 American Physical Society
| All rights reserved | Terms of Use
| Contact Us
Headquarters
1 Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740-3844
(301) 209-3200
Editorial Office
1 Research Road, Ridge, NY 11961-2701
(631) 591-4000
Office of Public Affairs
529 14th St NW, Suite 1050, Washington, D.C. 20045-2001
(202) 662-8700