2008 APS March Meeting
Volume 53, Number 2
Monday–Friday, March 10–14, 2008;
New Orleans, Louisiana
Session W7: Nonlinear Dynamics of Neural Systems: A Statistical Mechanics of the Brain
2:30 PM–5:30 PM,
Thursday, March 13, 2008
Morial Convention Center
Room: RO5
Sponsoring
Units:
DBP GSNP
Chair: John Beggs, Indiana University
Abstract ID: BAPS.2008.MAR.W7.5
Abstract: W7.00005 : Optimal processing and the statistics of visual input signals
4:54 PM–5:30 PM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Rob de Ruyter van Steveninck
(Indiana University Bloomington)
Sensory information processing can be seen as a statistical estimation
problem, where relevant features are extracted from a raw stream of sensory
input containing an imperfect representation of those features. Broadly
speaking, the optimal solution to the feature extraction problem depends on
the statistical structure of those input signals. Here we study the
statistics of natural visual input signals, and the optimal solution to the
problem of visual motion detection.
Motion detection is a biologically important feature estimation problem, as
many animals use vision to estimate their motion through space. Many years
ago, Reichardt and Poggio drew attention to two important aspects of this
problem: First, computing motion from an array of photosensors is an
irreducibly nonlinear operation, and second, biological versions of this
operation seem mathematically tractable. To paraphrase, the problem is
interesting but not hopelessly complicated. In this spirit I will discuss
motion estimation in the visual system of the blowfly, with an emphasis on
performance under natural conditions. As noted above, the array of
photoreceptors in the retina implicitly contains data on self motion, but
this relation is noisy, indirect and ambiguous due to photon shot noise and
optical blurring, and also as a result of the structure of the natural
environment. Further, natural variations in the visual signal to noise ratio
are enormous, and nonlinear operations are especially susceptible to noise.
One can therefore reasonably hope that animals have evolved interesting
optimization strategies to deal with large variations in signal quality. I
will present experimental data, both from sampling natural probability
distributions, and from motion sensitive neurons in the fly brain, that
illustrate some of these solutions and that suggest that the fly indeed
approaches optimality. The implications of these findings and their possible
generalizations will be discussed.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2008.MAR.W7.5