2008 APS March Meeting
Volume 53, Number 2
Monday–Friday, March 10–14, 2008;
New Orleans, Louisiana
Session V4: Electronic Excitations in Organic Molecular Crystals/Fluctuating Fronts: Beyond a Popular Mean-Field Theory
11:15 AM–2:15 PM,
Thursday, March 13, 2008
Morial Convention Center
Room: 206
Sponsoring
Unit:
DCMP
Chair: Vitaly Podzorov, Rutgers University
Abstract ID: BAPS.2008.MAR.V4.4
Abstract: V4.00004 : Particle versus density models in spark formation: X-rays from pulled fronts?
1:03 PM–1:39 PM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Ute Ebert
(CWI Amsterdam and Eindhoven Univ. Techn.)
Streamer discharges govern the early stages of sparks and
lightning, of spark-like phenomena in water, oil, and
semiconductors, in industrial corona reactors, or in gigantic
sprite discharges above thunderclouds [1,2]. Thunderstorms
recently have been found to emit terrestrial gamma-ray flashes or
X-rays towards satellites and towards the ground. These emissions
might be explained by particle models of ``pulled'' streamer
ionization fronts. In general, the growing discharge channel has
an inner structure with multiple scales [1-3]. While the largest
part of this channel can be treated in a density approximation
for the electrons and ions, the dynamics of the ionization front
is that of a pulled front; it is determined in the leading edge
where the density approach eventually breaks down. We therefore
investigate a realistic MC particle model for the motion of
single electrons in a discharge in pure nitrogen. The particle
model not only incorporates particle fluctuations, but also shows
that the electron energies are systematically larger in the
leading edge of the front than in the corresponding density
model, and that the ionization level behind the front is higher
as well, while the front velocity hardly changes [3]. These
effects increase with increasing applied electric field and might
actually cause the recently observed X-ray emission from
lightning through rare very energetic runaway electrons in the
tail of the distribution. Comparing the leading edge of the
particle front with a linear particle avalanche, the avalanche
shows the same mean density gradient and energy overshoot in its
leading edge as the nonlinear front; hence the pulled front
concept in this sense applies to discrete particle models as well
[3]. This gives a key to understanding the above effects through
analytical approximations and to develop efficient numerical
methods coupling particle and density models in space.\\
{[1]} U. Ebert {\it et al.}, Plasma Sources Sci. Techn. {\bf 15},
S118 (2006) (arXiv:physics/0604023).\\
{[2]} {\it Streamers, sprites, leaders, lightning: From micro- to
macroscales}, workshop in Oct. 2007: \\ {\tt
http://www.lorentzcenter.nl/lc/web/2007/265/info.php3?wsid=265};
and cluster issue in J. Phys. D in fall 2008; organizers/editors:
U. Ebert and D.D. Sentman.\\
{[3]} C. Li {\it et al.}, J. Appl. Phys. {\bf 101}, 123305 (2007)
(arXiv:physics/0702129).
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2008.MAR.V4.4