2008 APS March Meeting
Volume 53, Number 2
Monday–Friday, March 10–14, 2008;
New Orleans, Louisiana
Session S32: Focus Session: Magnetic Tunneling
2:30 PM–5:30 PM,
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
Morial Convention Center
Room: 225
Sponsoring
Units:
GMAG DMP FIAP
Chair: Jack Bass, Michigan State University
Abstract ID: BAPS.2008.MAR.S32.4
Abstract: S32.00004 : Transport and spin transfer torques in Fe/MgO/Fe tunnel barriers.
3:06 PM–3:42 PM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Christian Heiliger
(CNST, NIST, Gaithersburg, MD / NanoCenter, UMD, College Park, MD)
The prediction of very high tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR)
ratios in crystalline Fe/MgO/Fe [1,2] tunnel junctions has been
verified by a number of experiments [3,4]. The high TMR can be
understood in terms of the electronic structure of the system.
In MgO the $\Delta_1$ states at the Brillouin zone center decay
the most slowly and dominate the tunnelling current. For
coherent interfaces, which are achievable due to the small
lattice mismatch between Fe and MgO, these $\Delta_1$ states at
the Brillouin zone center are half-metallic in the Fe layers.
The dominance of the $\Delta_1$ states and their
half-metallicity cause the high tunnelling magnetoresistance
measured in Fe/MgO/Fe tunnel junctions [5]. For the spin
transfer torque, we calculate the linear response for small
currents and voltages. Our calculations show that the half
metallicity of the Fe $\Delta_1$ states leads to a strong
localization of the spin transfer torque to the interface. As a
result, the linear current dependence of the torque in the plane
of the two magnetizations is independent of the free layer
thickness for more than three monolayers of Fe. For perfect
samples we also find a linear current dependence of the
out-of-plane component. However, this linear piece oscillates
rapidly with thickness and averages to zero in the presence of
structural imperfections like thickness fluctuation, in
agreement with experiment [6]. In this talk I discuss the bias
dependence of the TMR and spin transfer torque effects mentioned
above and the influence on them of the following factors: the
interface structure Fe/MgO, the barrier thickness, and the
structure of the leads [7]. This work has been supported in
part by the NIST-CNST/UMD-NanoCenter Cooperative Agreement.
[1] W. Butler, X.-G. Zhang, T. Schulthess, J. MacLaren, Phys.
Rev. B 63 (2001) 054416.
[2] J. Mathon, A. Umerski, Phys. Rev. B 63 (2001) 220403.
[3] S. Yuasa, T. Nagahama, A. Fukushima, Y. Suzuki, K. Ando,
Nature Materials 3 (2004) 868.
[4] S.S.P. Parkin, C. Kaiser, A. Panchula, P.M. Rice, B. Hughes,
M. Samant, S.-H. Yang
Nature Materials 3 (2004) 862.
[5] C. Heiliger, P. Zahn, I. Mertig, Materials Today 9 (2006)
46.
[6] J. C. Sankey, P. M. Braganca, A. G. F. Garcia, I. N.
Krivorotov, R. A. Buhrman, and D. C. Ralph, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96
(2006) 227601.
[7] C. Heiliger, M.Gradhand, P. Zahn, I. Mertig, Phys. Rev.
Lett. 99 (2007) 066804.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2008.MAR.S32.4