17th Biennial International Conference of the APS Topical Group on Shock Compression of Condensed Matter
Volume 56, Number 6
Sunday–Friday, June 26–July 1 2011;
Chicago, Illinois
Session L6: Ballistics I: Heterogeneous Media
9:15 AM–10:45 AM,
Wednesday, June 29, 2011
Room: Grand Ballroom VI
Chair: David Lambert, Air Force Research Laboratory
Abstract ID: BAPS.2011.SHOCK.L6.1
Abstract: L6.00001 : Verification and Validation of computational models for shaped charge jet completion of well bores in fluid saturated sandstone
9:15 AM–9:45 AM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Rebecca M. Brannon
(University of Utah)
Completion of cased and cemented wells by shaped charge
perforation is a now standard method to establish a pathway
liberating oil entrained in reservoir sandstone. However, the
penetration event causes its own damage to the formation,
potentially reducing well productivity by lodging fragmentation
fines in pore throats. To simulate the perforation and
penetration process, a computational framework must accommodate
massive deformations (usually necessitating an
Eulerian solver) while at the same time preserving the integrity
of highly history-dependent internal state variables in
constitutive models for inelastic flow, damage, and fracture.
Results from a three year effort to improve predictive
capability of numerical models of well bore completion are
summarized. A hierarchical approach to verification and
validation (V\&V) is underway that begins with numerous
straightforward verification tests, then introduces simple
partial constitutive validation tests for simple loading (such as
demonstrations that the constitutive models can
reproduce observed unconfined and confined uniaxial stress data
for drained and undrained sandstone), partial
validation of the solvers for penetration of aluminium plates,
and culminating in a full-scale simulation of the entire
completion process consisting of: manufacture of the shaped
charge jet liners, explosive formation of the jet,
perforation of the metal well bore casing and cement, penetration
of the compressed saturated sandstone, and
subsequent flow of water and oil from the formation. The parts of
this V\&V effort to be discussed include: qualitative
trend testing of the manufacturing process for power-compacted
liners, trend testing (with some quantitative verification
against idealized models) of the new effective-stress component
of the sandstone constitutive model, convergence
testing for benchmark tests of localization and fracture, massive
deformation kinematics trend testing in a converging
plate problem (which emulates shaped charge jet formation without
having to worry about the explosives model),
incorporation of aleatory uncertainty, and quantitatively
assessing accuracy and convergence of the particle-based
momentum solver via new manufactured solutions
(\textit{cf.}\footnote{P. Knupp and K. Salari,
\textit{Verification of Computer Codes in Computational Science
and Engineering}, Chapman and Hall/CRC, (2003).}). These new
manufactured solutions
allow quantifying
accuracy of the host code's solver when it is used with
history-dependent plasticity and damage constitutive
models (these tests also assess basis and frame indifference of
the constitutive model). Benefits of hierarchical
approaches to V\&V include catching anomalous behaviours, such as
under-integration of the Jacobian in large shear
time steps, that would not have been otherwise detected in
``reasonable looking'' simulation results.\footnote{A.
Sadeghirad, R. Brannon and J. Burghardt, ``A convected particle
domain
interpolation technique to extend applicability of the material
point method for problems involving massive deformations,''
\textit{Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng}, (2011) accepted for
publication.} These verification tests are
illustrated in an example that quantitatively reveals
advantages of a particular enhancement of the material point
method\footnote{D. Sulsky, A. Chen and H. Schreyer, ``A particle
method for history-dependent materials", \textit{Comput. Meth.
Appl. Mech. Eng,} \textbf{118}, 179-196 (1994).} over other
large-deformation solvers.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2011.SHOCK.L6.1