Bulletin of the American Physical Society
2024 APS March Meeting
Monday–Friday, March 4–8, 2024; Minneapolis & Virtual
Session D50: Holistic QCVV Techniques and Shadow TomographyFocus Session
|
Hide Abstracts |
Sponsoring Units: DQI Chair: Samuel Stein, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Room: 200H |
Monday, March 4, 2024 3:00PM - 3:12PM |
D50.00001: Validating models of quantum computers in practice Megan L Dahlhauser, Kevin Young, Robin Blume-Kohout, Timothy J Proctor Predictive models of quantum computing devices are essential for understanding quantum devices' behavior, quantifying the rates and kinds of errors, and enabling engineering improvements. But models for a processor's behavior—whether derived from theory or from experimental characterization protocols run on a device—are not always accurate. Models are useful only inasmuch as their predictions are accurate, and inconsistencies with experimental data suggest that a model should be adjusted or replaced. We present simple and easy-to-use techniques for testing the validity of models using experimental data from running quantum circuits, and we demonstrate them using data from cloud-access quantum computers. We begin by showing how to determine if a model is consistent with a data set. Most real world models are not fully consistent with data, so we then show how to probe the inconsistencies between the model and the data by quantifying and analyzing the deviations using operationally meaningful error metrics. |
Monday, March 4, 2024 3:12PM - 3:24PM |
D50.00002: Scalable Benchmarking of Quantum Chemistry Algorithms using Circuit Mirroring Aidan Q Wilber-Gauthier, Stefan K Seritan, Andrew D Baczewski, Timothy J Proctor Current benchmarking methods for measuring progress towards applications on quantum computers often lack scalability and specificity. This limits their ability to produce generalizable metrics of processor performance. We will describe a method for creating scalable application-specific benchmarks using mirrored subcircuits that quantify a device's ability to execute particular subroutines or entire algorithms. We will then apply this method to two quantum chemistry subroutines, performing noisy numerical simulations and interpreting their results within the paradigm of volumetric benchmarking. We will show how to extract effective error rates and predict full circuit fidelities from the subcircuit data and demonstrate that we can distinguish differences in performance resulting from structural properties of the circuits. |
Monday, March 4, 2024 3:24PM - 3:36PM |
D50.00003: Parity Measurement Gate Set Tomography Piper C Wysocki, Stefan K Seritan, Kenneth Rudinger Parity measurements, used for detecting errors during the execution of a logical quantum circuit, are essential components of quantum error correction. We seek to fully characterize a parity measurement in order to understand its error mechanisms and how to mitigate them. However, parity measurements admit complex error modes, including those found neither in quantum gates nor terminating measurements. We experimentally characterize a two-qubit mid-circuit parity measurement using quantum instrument gate set tomography (arXiv:2103.03008) on IBM Quantum hardware, modeling the parity check as a two-qubit quantum instrument; this allows us to both fully reconstruct the parity measurement's corresponding process matrices as well as detect the presence of non-Markovian errors introduced by the measurement. |
Monday, March 4, 2024 3:36PM - 3:48PM |
D50.00004: Characterizing Hybrid Quantum Algorithms for Quantum Performance Benchmarks Aman Mehta, Thomas Lubinski, Joshua Goings, Sonika Johri, Nithin Reddy, Sonny Rappaport, Niranjan Bhatia, Luning Zhao Hybrid quantum algorithms have emerged as potential candidates to gain computational advantage on Noisy Intermediatory-Scale Quantum (NISQ) Computers. Here we discuss two such algorithms used in Quantum Chemistry and Machine Learning: Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) and Quantum Convolution Neural Networks (QCNN). We evaluate the performance of these algorithms in the context of an advanced benchmarking framework for quantum computers designed to estimate resource utilization and calculate application-specific metrics. This allows us to examine the trade-off between run-time execution performance and the quality of solutions for iterative hybrid quantum-classical applications and also highlight the limitations of the algorithms. The benchmarking suite can be executed on simulators as well as existing hardware and is an enhancement to the QED-C's Application-Oriented Benchmark suite. |
Monday, March 4, 2024 3:48PM - 4:00PM |
D50.00005: Benchmarking quantum processor quality in the utility era Luke C Govia, David C McKay, Swarnadeep Majumder, Ian Hincks, Malcolm Carroll, Samantha Barron, Christopher J Wood, Emily J Pritchett, Seth T Merkel As quantum processors enter the era of utility, it becomes increasingly important to develop benchmarking suites capable of addressing quality, speed, and scale. With scale increasing rapidly for utility, quality benchmarks are needed that can be run at large scales. In this talk, we report developments towards such benchmarks. We present a device benchmark that captures the generic performance of a quantum processor and is scalable to large systems while still capturing important multi-qubit effects like cross-talk. Further, we show in what sense Clifford circuits can be representative of generic circuit performance, and how this can be extended to benchmark applications and error mitigation schemes. |
Monday, March 4, 2024 4:00PM - 4:12PM |
D50.00006: Optimal twirling depth for classical shadows in the presence of noise. Pierre-Gabriel Rozon, Ning Bao, Kartiek Agarwal The classical shadows protocol represents an efficient strategy for estimating properties of an unknown state ρ using a finite number of copies and measurements. In its original form, it involves twirling the state with unitaries randomly selected from a fixed ensemble and measuring the twirled state in a predetermined basis. To compute local properties of the system, it has been demonstrated that optimal sample complexity (the minimal number of required copies) is remarkably achieved when unitaries are drawn from shallow-depth circuits composed of local entangling gates, as opposed to purely local (zero-depth) or global twirling (infinite-depth) ensembles. |
Monday, March 4, 2024 4:12PM - 4:48PM |
D50.00007: Characterizing noise in QEC circuits Invited Speaker: Robin Harper Quantum error correction (QEC) is essential for fault-tolerant quantum computing. QEC circuits protect quantum information from the effects of noise by encoding it across multiple physical qubits. Knowledge of the relevant characteristics of the noise that exists in devices while they run candidate QEC circuits can potentially enable the design of more efficient and reliable circuits for particular devices. For instance, knowldedge of bias, error spread, and possible error correlations can lead to circuits specifically targeted at correcting such errors as well as tailoring decoders designed for specific devices. Fast and efficient characterization also allows for verification and tailoring of error mitigation techniques, such as dynamic decoupling. I will discuss techniques for efficient characterisation of such noise, both at a holistic circuit level and at a phenomonological level, including data obtained from utilising such techniques on devices. Finally, the scale of data returned by these modern characterization techniques is such that we are rapidly approaching the stage where it will soon be unrealistic to attempt to analyse all the data obtained. I will discuss efficient methods of representing the data through scalable models and discuss how such models can be used in the push towards designing more efficient and reliable QEC circuits. |
Monday, March 4, 2024 4:48PM - 5:00PM |
D50.00008: Time-resolved shadow tomography of open quantum systems Joseph Barreto, Arman Babakhani, Onkar Apte, Daniel A Lidar Shadow tomography is a powerful and resource-frugal characterization technique which permits the estimation of a set of expectation values of an arbitrary quantum state using a number of measurements that scales only logarithmically in the size of the observable set. Allowing the state in question to undergo general non-unitary evolution, we leverage shadow tomography to resolve the time-dependence of this observable set and thereby efficiently estimate parameters of the open system dynamics via compressed sensing. |
Monday, March 4, 2024 5:00PM - 5:12PM |
D50.00009: Predicting many state properties with robust shallow circuit shadow tomography Hong-Ye Hu, Andi Gu, Swarnadeep Majumder, Hang Ren, Yipei Zhang, Derek S Wang, Zlatko K Minev, Yizhuang You, Alireza Seif, Susanne F Yelin Efficient prediction of many quantum state properties is crucial for quantum information processing. Through the use of randomized measurements and shallow circuits, classical shadow tomography emerges as a highly efficient, promising approach compatible with near-term quantum processors. This work presents the Robust Shallow Shadow (RSS) method, designed to operate effectively mitigate correlated noise, and provides a theoretical analysis of RSS behavior within the shallow-circuit region. We further illustrate the efficacy of RSS by demonstrating its performance using superconducting quantum processors. |
Monday, March 4, 2024 5:12PM - 5:24PM |
D50.00010: Efficiently estimating observables of varying locality using tensor-network-inspired classical shadows Jonathan Kunjummen, Katherine Van Kirk, Hong-Ye Hu, Yanting Teng, Christian Kokail, Jacob M Taylor Classical shadow tomography is a powerful randomized measurement technique for estimating $M$ state observables with $O(log M)$ measurements. While global Clifford randomized measurements are sample-optimal for some learning tasks, their implementation remains experimentally inaccessible for large systems because they require a number of gates quadratic in the system size. We show how to recover some aspects of global Clifford scaling using far fewer gates with tensor-network-inspired classical shadows. We consider two implementations: projecting the state of interest into a random matrix product state (MPS) or a random multiscale entanglement renormalization ansatz (MERA) state. We present numerical and analytic evidence that, when estimating observables across a range of scales, these tensor network structures can achieve shadow norms (a figure of merit directly related to measurement sample complexity) with more favorable scaling than the best known bounds on existing shadow schemes. For example, the best-known scheme for learning k-local Pauli observables is shallow shadows, whose variance is upper bounded by $2.28^k$. Both of our implementations outperform this bound, and we provide a framework for implementing our sample-efficient measurements in neutral atom arrays. Our work brings the advantages of randomized measurement protocols closer to experimental realization and highlights the power of making randomized measurements at multiple scales. |
Monday, March 4, 2024 5:24PM - 5:36PM |
D50.00011: Neural-shadow quantum state tomography: applications for near-term quantum devices Abhijit Chakraborty, Victor Wei, William A Coish, Pooya Ronagh, Christine A Muschik Neural network quantum state is a classical ansatz that has been implemented successfully in reconstructing quantum states from measurement data. In this process, known as neural network quantum state tomography (NNQST), a neural network is trained using a cross-entropy loss function to get the amplitudes and relative phases of a pure quantum state. However, NNQST often has difficulty in determining the relative phases of a quantum state. In this talk, we propose an alternative neural network-based protocol, which we call neural-shadow quantum state tomography (NSQST). NSQST uses infidelity as a loss function and combines classical shadows with computational basis measurements via a pretraining procedure. Here, the infidelity loss function is efficiently estimated using classical shadows of the target state. We demonstrate that NSQST has an advantage over NNQST in learning the relative phases of target quantum states and offers noise robustness in the case of Clifford shadows. We further focus on the implementation and usefulness of this protocol in near-term quantum devices. |
Monday, March 4, 2024 5:36PM - 5:48PM |
D50.00012: Predicting Arbitrary State Properties from Single Hamiltonian Quench Dynamics Zhenhuan Liu, Zihan Hao, Hong-Ye Hu Extracting arbitrary state properties from analog quantum simulations presents a significant challenge due to the necessity of diverse basis measurements. Recent advancements in randomized measurement schemes have successfully reduced measurement sample complexity, yet they demand precise control over each qubit. In this work, we propose the Hamiltonian shadow protocol, which solely depends on quench dynamics with a single Hamiltonian, without any ancillary systems. We provide a theoretical guarantee that our protocol can unbiasedly predict arbitrary state properties. We also derive the sample complexity of this protocol and show it performs similarly to the classical shadow protocol. Hamiltonian shadow protocol does not require any sophisticated control and is universally applicable to various analog quantum systems, as illustrated through numerical demonstrations with Rydberg atom arrays under realistic parameter settings. The new protocol significantly broadens the application of randomized measurements for analog quantum simulators without precise control and ancillary systems. |
Monday, March 4, 2024 5:48PM - 6:00PM |
D50.00013: Stressing Out Modern Quantum Hardware: Performance Evaluation and Insights Aliza U Siddiqui, Kaitlin M Gili, Chris J Ballance Quantum hardware is progressing at a rapid pace and, alongside this progression, it is vital to challenge the |
Follow Us |
Engage
Become an APS Member |
My APS
Renew Membership |
Information for |
About APSThe American Physical Society (APS) is a non-profit membership organization working to advance the knowledge of physics. |
© 2025 American Physical Society
| All rights reserved | Terms of Use
| Contact Us
Headquarters
1 Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740-3844
(301) 209-3200
Editorial Office
100 Motor Pkwy, Suite 110, Hauppauge, NY 11788
(631) 591-4000
Office of Public Affairs
529 14th St NW, Suite 1050, Washington, D.C. 20045-2001
(202) 662-8700