APS March Meeting 2013
Volume 58, Number 1
Monday–Friday, March 18–22, 2013;
Baltimore, Maryland
Session N14: Focus Session: Spin-dependent Tunneling and High Magnetoresistance Devices
11:15 AM–2:15 PM,
Wednesday, March 20, 2013
Room: 316
Sponsoring
Units:
DMP FIAP GMAG
Chair: See-Hun Yang, IBM Almaden Research Center
Abstract ID: BAPS.2013.MAR.N14.4
Abstract: N14.00004 : Mechanisms of perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and interlayer exchange coupling in MgO-based tunnel junctions*
11:51 AM–12:27 PM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Mairbek Chshiev
(SPINTEC, CEA/CNRS/UJF-Grenoble 1, INAC, 38054 Grenoble, France)
Magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJ) comprising ferromagnetic (FM) electrodes
with MgO spacer have been an object of high interest for spintronics due to
Bloch states symmetry spin filtering leading to high tunnel
magnetoresistance (TMR) [1] and due to observation of antiferromagnetic (AF)
coupling between FM electrodes across MgO spacer [2]. This attention have
been strongly reinforced in a view of a huge interest in MTJs with
perpendicularly magnetized magnetic layers (p-MTJs) originating from large
values of interfacial perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) first observed
at Pt\textbar Co\textbar MOx interfaces (M$=$Ta, Mg, Al, Ru\textellipsis )
[3,4] and later reported for Co\textbar MgO [4,5] and CoFeB\textbar MgO
p-MTJs [6].
In this talk we will elucidate mechanisms responsible for the PMA from
first-principles [7] and report the effect of interfacial oxidation
conditions on the PMA in Fe(Co)\textbar MgO p-MTJs. In particular, we found
very large PMA values for MTJs with pure interfaces in agreement with recent
experiments [4,6]. Furthermore, it will be demonstrated that oxidation
conditions strongly affect the PMA which strongly correlates with TMR in
agreement with experiments [7,8]. Finally, we will discuss the origin of AF
coupling in Co\textbar MgO p-MTJs which oscillates as a function of FM layer
thickness in agreement with theories of interlayer exchange coupling in MTJ
[5].\\[4pt]
[1] W.H. Butler et al, \textit{Phys. Rev. B} 63,054416(2001); \textit{IEEE Trans. Magn. }41,2645(2005).\\[0pt]
[2] J. Faure-Vincent et al, \textit{Phys. Rev. Lett.} 89,107206(2002); T. Katayama et al, \textit{Appl. Phys. Lett.} 89,112503(2006); H.-X. Yang et al, \textit{Appl. Phys. Lett.}~ 96,262509(2010).\\[0pt]
[3] S. Monso et al, \textit{Appl. Phys. Lett.} 80,4157(2002); B. Rodmacq et al, \textit{J. Appl. Phys.} 93,7513(2003).\\[0pt]
[4] L. Nistor et al, \textit{Appl. Phys. Lett.} 94,012512(2009).\\[0pt]
[5] L. Nistor et al, \textit{IEEE Trans. Magn.} 45,3472(2009); \textit{Phys. Rev. B} 81,220407(2010).\\[0pt]
[6] S. Ikeda et al, \textit{Nature Mat.,} 9,271(2010).\\[0pt]
[7] H.-X. Yang et al, \textit{Phys. Rev. B}~84,054401(2011).\\[0pt]
[8] L. Nistor et al, \textit{IEEE Trans. Magn.} 46,1412(2010).
*We acknowledge support of Grenoble Nanosciences Foundation.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2013.MAR.N14.4