APS March Meeting 2013
Volume 58, Number 1
Monday–Friday, March 18–22, 2013;
Baltimore, Maryland
Session 1A: Industrial Physics Forum: Innovation and Entrepreneurship
2:30 PM–5:30 PM,
Sunday, March 17, 2013
Room: Ballroom IV
Chair: David Seiler, National Institute of Standards and Technology
Abstract ID: BAPS.2013.MAR.1A.5
Abstract: 1A.00005 : Physics and Innovation: A Large-Company Perspective
4:54 PM–5:30 PM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Robert Doering
(Texas Instruments)
With regard to its influence on \textit{innovation} (i.e., creating new commercial
technologies), physics continuously faces the challenge of ``keeping ahead
of engineering'' and ``moving on'' to new concepts as well as to potentially
new roles with respect to industrial research. For most large companies, the
R{\&}D model has undergone significant transformation over the past three
decades. This has been driven, in part, by the increasing cost of
continuously developing new technologies upon which to base state-of-the-art
products. Part of this challenge is to select which new concepts and
``emerging technologies'' to pursue. A poor decision at this point wastes
development resources and can be very difficult to overcome later.
Therefore, a key feature of many new R{\&}D models is collaboration with
entities outside of the corporation. Such partnerships reduce both the cost
and risk of exploring multiple lines of research which may lead to new
technologies. One flexible approach to organizing R{\&}D partnerships is via
the establishment of a consortium. The semiconductor industry has
successfully used research consortia since the founding of the Semiconductor
Research Corporation (SRC) in 1982 and SEMATECH a few years later. The
automotive industry has also used the consortium approach for many years
since the formation of the United States Council for Automotive Research
(USCAR) in 1992. In the case of the SRC, the principal operating methodology
is for the members to create requests for proposals leading to the
collective funding of university research. This is often done in partnership
with federal agencies. For example, the Focus Center Research Program (FCRP,
an SRC subsidiary) is co-funded with DARPA. Another SRC subsidiary, the
Nanoelectronics Research Initiative (NRI) is jointly supported with the NSF
and NIST. This NRI-agency partnership has partly been enabled by the
National Nanotechnology Initiative's Signature Initiative on
``Nanoelectronics for 2020 and Beyond.'' Within the SRC portfolio, the NRI
research is particularly ``physics intensive''! Of course, in addition to
consortia, the new models typically include external R{\&}D through
consulting arrangements, IP licensing, and acquisition of smaller companies
that have developed useful new technologies, supported in some cases by
SBIRs and other forms of government investment in growth of the economy.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2013.MAR.1A.5