APS March Meeting 2011
Volume 56, Number 1
Monday–Friday, March 21–25, 2011;
Dallas, Texas
Session Q5: The Physics of Confronting Weapons of Mass Destruction: Chemical, Biological and Nuclear
11:15 AM–2:15 PM,
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
Room: Ballroom C1
Sponsoring
Unit:
FIAP
Chair: Jay Davis, Hertz Foundation
Abstract ID: BAPS.2011.MAR.Q5.5
Abstract: Q5.00005 : Detecting Chemical Weapons: Threats, Requirements, Solutions, and Future Challenges
1:39 PM–2:15 PM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Brian Boso
(Smiths Detection)
Although chemicals have been reportedly used as weapons for
thousands of years, it was not until 1915 at Ypres, France that
an industrial chemical, chlorine, was used in World
War I as an offensive weapon in significant quantity, causing
mass casualties. From that point until today the development,
detection, production and protection from chemical weapons has be
an organized endeavor of many of the world's armed forces and in
more recent times, non-governmental terrorist organizations.
The number of Chemical Warfare Agents (CWAs) has steadily
increased as research into more toxic substances continued for
most of the 20$^{\rm th}$ century. Today there are over 70
substances including harassing agents like tear gas,
incapacitating agents, and lethal agents like blister, blood,
chocking, and nerve agents.
The requirements for detecting chemical weapons vary depending on
the context in which they are encountered and the concept of
operation of the organization deploying the detection equipment.
The US DoD, for example, has as a requirement, that US forces be
able to continue their mission, even in the event of a chemical
attack. This places stringent requirements on detection
equipment. It must be lightweight ($<$2 lbs), detect a large
array of chemical warfare agents and toxic industrial chemicals,
detect and warn at concentration levels and time duration to
prevent acute health effects, meet military ruggedness
specifications and work over a wide range of temperature and
humidity, and have a very high probability of detection with a
similarly low probability of false positives.
The current technology of choice to meet these stringent
requirements is Ion Mobility Spectrometry. Many technologies are
capable of detecting chemicals at the trace levels required and
have been extensively developed for this application, including,
but not limited to: mass spectroscopy, IR spectroscopy, RAMAN
spectroscopy, MEMs micro-cantilever sensors, surface acoustic
wave sensors, differential mobility spectrometry, and amplifying
fluorescence polymers.
In the future the requirements for detection equipment will
continue to become even more stringent. The continuing increase
in the sheer number of threats that will need to be detected, the
development of binary agents requiring that even the precursor
chemicals be detected, the development of new types of agents
unlike any of the current chemistries, and the expansion of the
list of toxic industrial chemical will require new techniques
with higher specificity and more sensitivity.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2011.MAR.Q5.5