2007 APS March Meeting
Volume 52, Number 1
Monday–Friday, March 5–9, 2007;
Denver, Colorado
Session P1: Recent Advances in Magnetization Dynamics
11:15 AM–2:15 PM,
Wednesday, March 7, 2007
Colorado Convention Center
Room: Four Seasons 2-3
Sponsoring
Unit:
DCMP
Chair: Jonathan Sun, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
Abstract ID: BAPS.2007.MAR.P1.5
Abstract: P1.00005 : Fingerprinting Magnetic Nanostructures by First Order Reversal Curves*
1:39 PM–2:15 PM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Kai Liu
(University of California - Davis)
Realistic systems of magnetic nanostructures inevitably have
\textit{inhomogeneities}, which are manifested in distributions
of magnetic properties, mixed
magnetic phases, different magnetization reversal mechanisms,
etc. The first
order reversal curve (FORC) method [1-3] is ideally suited for
``fingerprinting'' such systems, both qualitatively and
quantitatively. Here
we present recent FORC studies on a few technologically important
systems.
In arrays of Fe nanodots [4], as the dot size decreases from 67
to 52nm, we
have observed a vortex state to single-domain transition. Despite
subtle
changes in the major hysteresis loops, striking differences are
seen in the
FORC diagrams. The FORC method also gives quantitative measures
of the
magnetic phase fractions and vortex nucleation and annihilation
fields.
Furthermore, with decreasing temperature, it is more difficult to
nucleate
vortices within the dots and the single domain phase fraction
increases. In
exchange spring magnets [3], we have investigated the
reversibility of the
soft and hard layers and the interlayer exchange coupling. In
FeNi/polycrystalline-FePt films, the FeNi and FePt layers reverse
in a
continuous process via a vertical spiral. In Fe/epitaxial-SmCo
films, the
reversal proceeds by a reversible rotation of the Fe soft layer,
followed by
an irreversible switching of the SmCo hard layer. As the SmCo
partially
demagnetizes, the Fe layer still remains reversible, as revealed
by second
order reversal curves (SORC). The exchange coupling between the
two layers
can be extracted as a function of the SmCo demagnetization state.
These
results demonstrate that FORC is a powerful method for magnetization
reversal studies, due to its capability of capturing magnetic
inhomogeneities, sensitivity to irreversible switching, and the
quantitative
phase information it can extract.
Work done in collaboration with J. E. Davies, R. K. Dumas, J.
Olamit, C. P. Li, I. V. Roshchin, I. K. Schuller, O. Hellwig, E.
E. Fullerton, J. S. Jiang, S. D. Bader, J. Wu, C. Leighton, H. G.
Katzgraber, C. R. Pike, R. T. Scalettar, G. T. Zimanyi, and K. L.
Verosub.
\newline
\newline
[1] C. R. Pike, et al, JAP \textbf{85}, 6660 (1999).
\newline
[2] H. G. Katzgraber,
et al. PRL \textbf{89}, 257202 (2002).
\newline
[3] J. E. Davies, et al, PRB \textbf{70,} 224434 (2004); APL
\textbf{86,} 262503 (2005); PRB \textbf{72}, 134419 (2005).
\newline
[4] K. Liu, et al., APL. \textbf{81}, 4434 (2002).
*Supported by NSF, ACS-PRF, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, AFOSR, and DOE.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2007.MAR.P1.5