2007 APS March Meeting
Volume 52, Number 1
Monday–Friday, March 5–9, 2007;
Denver, Colorado
Session A6: Frontier in Computational Materials
8:00 AM–11:00 AM,
Monday, March 5, 2007
Colorado Convention Center
Room: 207
Sponsoring
Unit:
DCOMP
Chair: Giulia Galli, University of California, Davis
Abstract ID: BAPS.2007.MAR.A6.4
Abstract: A6.00004 : Quantum-Mechanical Combinatorial Design of Solids having Target Properties*
9:48 AM–10:24 AM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Alex Zunger
(National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401)
(1) One of the most striking aspects of solid state physics is
the diversity
of structural forms in which crystals appear in Nature. Not only
are there
many distinct crystal-types, but combinations of two or more
crystalline
materials (alloys) give rise to various local geometric atomic
patters. The
already rich repertoire of such forms has recently been
significantly
enhanced by the advent of artificial crystal growth techniques
(MBE, STM-
atom positioning, etc.) that can create desired structural forms,
such as
superlattices and impurity clusters even in defiance of the rules of
equilibrium thermodynamics.
(2) At the same time, the fields of chemistry of nanostructures
and physics
of structural phase-transitions have long revealed that different
atomic
configurations generally lead to different physical properties
even without
altering the chemical makeup. While the most widely - known
illustration of
such ``form controls function'' rule is the dramatically
different color, conductivity and hardness of the allotropical
forms of pure carbon (diamond,graphite, C60), the physics of
semiconductor superstructures and
nanostructures is full of striking examples of how optical,
magnetic and
transport properties depend sensitively on atomic configuration.
(3) Yet, the history of material research has generally occurred via
accidental discoveries of material structures having interesting
physical
property (semiconductivity, ferromagnetism; superconductivity
etc.). This
begs the question: can this discovery process be inverted, i.e.
can we first
articulate a desired target physical property, then search
(within a class)
for the configuration that has this property?
(4) The number of potentially interesting atomic configurations
exhibits a combinatorial explosion, so even fast synthesis or
fast computations can not survey all.
(5) This talk describes the recent steps made by solid state
theory + computational physics to address this ``Inverse Design''
(Franceschetti
{\&} Zunger, Nature, 402, 60 (1999) problem. I will show how Genetic
Algorithms, in combination with efficient (``Order N'') solutions
to the
Pseudopotential Schrodinger equation allow us to investigate
astronomical
spaces of atomic configurations in search of the structure with a
target
physical property. Only a small fraction of all ($\sim $ 10**14
in our case) configurations need to be examined. Physical
properties are either calculated on-the-fly (if it's easy), or
first ``Cluster-Expanded'' (if the
theory is difficult). I will illustrate this Inverse Band
Structure approach for (a) Design of required band-gaps in
semiconductor superlattices; (b)
architecture of impurity --clusters with desired optical
properties (PRL 97, 046401, 2006) (c) search for configuration of
magnetic ions in semiconductors that maximize the ferromagnetic
Curie temperature (PRL, 97, 047202, 2006).
*Supported by DOE-SC-BES-DMS and DARPA under NREL DEAC36-98-GO10337.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2007.MAR.A6.4