2005 APS March Meeting
Monday–Friday, March 21–25, 2005;
Los Angeles, CA
Session H24: Focus Session: Friction, Fracture, and Deformation II
8:00 AM–11:00 AM,
Tuesday, March 22, 2005
LACC
Room: 411
Sponsoring
Units:
GSNP DMP
Chair: Robin Selinger, Catholic University
Abstract ID: BAPS.2005.MAR.H24.7
Abstract: H24.00007 : Deformation and Contact Between Self-Affine Surfaces*
9:12 AM–9:48 AM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Mark Robbins
(Johns Hopkins University)
Molecular interactions at contacts between surfaces determine
the strength of adhesion and friction forces. The total area of
contact and the spatial distribution of forces are
determined by a complex interplay between surface topography and
elastic and plastic deformation far below the surface. The
situation is further complicated by the fact that many real
surfaces have roughness on a wide range of lengths that can be
described by self-affine scaling. The talk will provide a
detailed analysis of contact between such self-affine surfaces.
First continuum mechanics results for elastic and plastic solids
will be contrasted. In both cases the contact area increases
linearly with the applied normal load, implying that the mean
pressure in the contacts $<$p$>$ is constant. For elastic
surfaces $<$p$>$ increases linearly with the root mean
squared slope of the surface, $\Delta$. For plastic surfaces,
$<$p$>$ is bounded by about six times the yield stress
$\sigma_y$, but over the typical range of $\sigma_y$, $<$p$>$ rises roughly as $\sigma_y^{2/3}$. The morphology of the
contacts is complex. Individual contacts have fractal area and
perimeters, and plastic deformation increases the fractal
dimension. There is a power law probability distribution $P(a)$
of cluster areas $a$: $P(a)\sim a^{-\tau}$. The value of $\tau$
is larger than 2 for elastic surfaces, and $\tau \approx 2$ for
plastic surfaces.
The above continuum results are next tested against MD
simulations of 2D and 3D solids with self-affine surfaces. We
find that the contact area is still linearly related to the
load, but the slope can differ from continuum predictions. For
elastic surfaces this arises from the failure of the continuum
assumption that surfaces are smooth and differentiable at small
scales. For plastic surfaces the discrepancies reflect unusual
modes of plastic deformation at the interface. These changes are
correlated to frictional forces in the simulations.
*Supported by NSF CMS-0103408
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2005.MAR.H24.7