2005 APS March Meeting
Monday–Friday, March 21–25, 2005;
Los Angeles, CA
Session B32: Focus Session: Superconductivity: Theory and Computation I
11:15 AM–2:03 PM,
Monday, March 21, 2005
LACC
Room: 507
Sponsoring
Units:
DCOMP DCMP
Chair: Jens Kortus, IPCMS
Abstract ID: BAPS.2005.MAR.B32.4
Abstract: B32.00004 : Denstity Functional Theory of Superconductivity*
11:51 AM–12:27 PM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
E.K.U. Gross
(Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik, Freie Universit\"at Berlin, Arnimallee 14, 14195 Berlin, Germany)
A novel density-functional approach to the description of
phonon-mediated
superconductivity is presented. The theory is formulated in terms
of three
quantities: the ordinary electron density, the superconducting order
parameter, and the nuclear N-body density. These three
``densities'' are
determined by a set of Bogoliubov-type Kohn-Sham equations
representing
the electronic degrees of freedom, and a Schr{\"o}dinger equation
with an
N-body interaction describing the nuclear motion. These equations are
coupled to each other via exchange-correlation (xc) potentials
which are
universal functionals of the three densities. The formalism can be
viewed either as a strong-coupling generalization of the
weak-coupling
DFT for superconductors [1] or as a superconducting generalization
of the multi-component DFT [2] for electrons and nuclei.
Approximations
of the universal xc functionals will be derived on the basis of
many-body perturbation theory [3,4]. In this way, a true ab-initio
description is achieved which does not contain any empirical
parameters.
Numerical results for the critical temperature and the gap will be
presented for simple metals [5], for MgB$_2$ [6], and for Li and Al
under pressure. In particular, for MgB$_2$, the two gaps and the
specific
heat as function of temperature are in very good agreement with
experimental data. Moreover, our calculations show clearly,
how the Coulomb interaction acts differently on $\sigma$ and
$\pi$ states,
thereby stabilizing the observed superconducting phase. For Li and Al
under pressure the calculations explain why these two metals
behave very differently, leading to a strong enhancement
of superconductivity for Li and to a clear suppression for Al
with increasing pressure.
\newcounter{fig}
\begin{list}{[\arabic{fig}]}{\usecounter{fig} \itemsep -1.7mm}
\item L.N. Oliveira, E.K.U. Gross, W. Kohn, PRL {\bf 60}, 2430
(1988).
\item T. Kreibich, E.K.U. Gross, PRL {\bf86}, 2984 (2001).
\item S. Kurth, M. Marques, M. L\"{u}ders, E.K.U. Gross, PRL {\bf
83}, 2628 (1999).
\item M. L\"uders et al, cond-mat/0408685 (2004).
\item M. Marques et al, cond-mat/0408686 (2004).
\item A. Floris et al, PRL (2004, in press).
\end{list}
*work done in cooperation with the groups of S. Massidda, Cagliari, and A. Continenza, L'Aquila
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2005.MAR.B32.4