2005 APS March Meeting
Monday–Friday, March 21–25, 2005;
Los Angeles, CA
Session WW7: The Physics and Bioengineering of Artificial Sight
5:30 PM–8:30 PM,
Thursday, March 24, 2005
LACC
Room: 408B
Sponsoring
Unit:
DBP
Chair: Robert Greenberg, Second Light LLC
Abstract ID: BAPS.2005.MAR.WW7.4
Abstract: WW7.00004 : Design of a High-resolution Optoelectronic Retinal Prosthesis
7:18 PM–7:54 PM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Daniel Palanker
(Dept. of Ophthalmology and Hansen Experimental Physics Lab, Stanford University)
It has been demonstrated that electrical stimulation of the retina can
produce visual percepts in blind patients suffering from macular
degeneration and retinitis pigmentosa. So far retinal implants have had just
a few electrodes, whereas at least several thousand pixels would be required
for any functional restoration of sight. We will discuss physical
limitations on the number of stimulating electrodes and on delivery of
information and power to the retinal implant.
Using a model of extracellular stimulation we derive the threshold values of
current and voltage as a function of electrode size and distance to the
target cell. Electrolysis, tissue heating, and cross-talk between
neighboring electrodes depend critically on separation between electrodes
and cells, thus strongly limiting the pixels size and spacing. Minimal pixel
density required for 20/80 visual acuity (2500 pixels/mm2, pixel size 20 um)
cannot be achieved unless the target neurons are within 7 um of the
electrodes. At a separation of 50 um, the density drops to 44 pixels/mm2,
and at 100 um it is further reduced to 10 pixels/mm2.
We will present designs of subretinal implants that provide close proximity
of electrodes to cells using migration of retinal cells to target areas. Two
basic implant geometries will be described: perforated membranes and
protruding electrode arrays.
In addition, we will discuss delivery of information to the implant that
allows for natural eye scanning of the scene, rather than scanning with a
head-mounted camera. It operates similarly to ``virtual reality'' imaging
devices where an image from a video camera is projected by a goggle-mounted
collimated infrared LED-LCD display onto the retina, activating an array of
powered photodiodes in the retinal implant. Optical delivery of visual
information to the implant allows for flexible control of the image
processing algorithms and stimulation parameters.
In summary, we will describe solutions to some of the major problems facing
the realization of a functional retinal implant: high pixel density,
proximity of electrodes to target cells, natural eye scanning capability,
and real-time image processing adjustable to retinal architecture.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2005.MAR.WW7.4