Bulletin of the American Physical Society
64th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics
Volume 67, Number 15
Monday–Friday, October 17–21, 2022; Spokane, Washington
Session UP11: Poster Session VIII: In-Person, Hall A (2:00-3:30pm) and Virtual Poster Presentations (3:45-5:00pm)
MFE: Whole Device Modeling, High Field Tokamaks, Tokamak Physics, DIII-D
FUND:Reconnection, Turbulence
2:00 PM - 5:00 PM
Thursday, October 20, 2022
Room: Exhibit Hall A and Online
Abstract: UP11.00102 : Differential Rotation Control for the DIII-D Tokamak via Model-Based Reinforcement Learning*
Presenter:
Ian Char
(Carnegie Mellon University)
Authors:
Ian Char
(Carnegie Mellon University)
Joe Abbate
(Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory)
Viraj Mehta
(Carnegie Mellon University)
Youngseog Chung
(Carnegie Mellon University)
Rory Conlin
(Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory)
Keith Erickson
(Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory)
Mark D Boyer
(Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory)
Nathan J Richner
(University of Wisconsin - Madison)
Laszlo Bardoczi
(General Atomics - San Diego)
Nikolas C Logan
(Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab)
Jayson L Barr
(General Atomics - San Diego)
Egemen Kolemen
(Princeton University)
Jeff Schneider
(Carnegie Mellon University)
Reinforcement learning has recently proven itself as a technique that is able to learn sophisticated controllers. Not only has it been leveraged to achieve super-human performance on games such as Go, but it also has been used for shape control on TCV. In this work, we wish to use these techniques to develop a controller that uses the beams to maintain a βN value while achieving specified differences in rotation between the q=1 and q=2 boundary. Prior works suggest that achieving a high difference between these boundaries can prevent NTMs, and development of such a controller would aid in testing this claim. Although developing this controller is important in its own right for investigating how rotation shear affects NTM seeding, a successful implementation of this controller will serve as an example of how arbitrary feedback controllers can be learned solely through data.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by DE- SC0021275 (Machine Learning for Real-time Fusion Plasma Behavior Prediction and Manipulation) and DE-FC02-04ER54698.
This work is supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. DGE1745016 and DGE2140739. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
*This work is supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. DGE1745016 and DGE2140739. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Follow Us |
Engage
Become an APS Member |
My APS
Renew Membership |
Information for |
About APSThe American Physical Society (APS) is a non-profit membership organization working to advance the knowledge of physics. |
© 2025 American Physical Society
| All rights reserved | Terms of Use
| Contact Us
Headquarters
1 Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740-3844
(301) 209-3200
Editorial Office
100 Motor Pkwy, Suite 110, Hauppauge, NY 11788
(631) 591-4000
Office of Public Affairs
529 14th St NW, Suite 1050, Washington, D.C. 20045-2001
(202) 662-8700