61st Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics
Volume 64, Number 11
Monday–Friday, October 21–25, 2019;
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Session UI2: Invited: ICF III
2:00 PM–5:00 PM,
Thursday, October 24, 2019
Room: Floridian Ballroom AB
Chair: Denise Hinkel, LLNL
Abstract ID: BAPS.2019.DPP.UI2.4
Abstract: UI2.00004 : Nonlinear electron and ion dynamics in the saturation of cross-beam energy transfer
3:30 PM–4:00 PM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Lin Yin
(Los Alamos National Laboratory)
Cross-beam energy transfer (CBET) allows crossing laser beams to exchange
energy. Understanding the nonlinear saturation of CBET, including effects of
wave-particle interaction with ions and electrons, excitation of forward
stimulated Raman scattering (FSRS), and speckle geometry, is important for
controlling low-mode asymmetry in ICF implosions. The nonlinear dynamics of
CBET for multi-speckled laser beams is examined using VPIC simulations under
NIF-like conditions. The simulations show CBET saturates on a fast
(\textasciitilde 10s of ps) time scale through ion trapping and excitation
of oblique FSRS in the seed beam. Ion trapping reduces wave damping and
speckle interaction increases wave coherence length to scales much larger
than the speckle width, together enhancing energy transfer, whereas ion
acoustic wave (IAW) breakup increases wave damping and contributes to CBET
saturation. The seed beam can also become unstable to oblique FSRS, which
leads to beam deflection and a frequency downshift. FSRS saturates on fast
(\textasciitilde ps) time scales by electron plasma wave self-focusing,
leading to enhanced side-loss hot electrons with energy exceeding 300 keV.
Such electrons may contribute to preheat but can be mitigated by introducing
density gradients. Scaling simulations show that CBET, as well as FSRS and
hot electrons, increase with beam average intensity, beam diameter, and
crossing area, but that CBET is limited by excitation of FSRS, IAW breakup,
and pump depletion. FSRS deflects the seed beam energy by \textgreater
40{\%} of incident beam energy and puts a few-{\%} of incident beam energy
into hot electrons. FSRS therefore limits the efficacy of CBET for symmetry
tuning at late stages in the implosion and may account for some of the
``missing energy'' inferred in implosions with gas-filled hohlraums.
Collaborators: B. J. Albright, D. J. Stark, D. Nystrom, R. F. Bird, K. J.
Bowers
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2019.DPP.UI2.4