Bulletin of the American Physical Society
60th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics
Volume 63, Number 11
Monday–Friday, November 5–9, 2018; Portland, Oregon
Session YI3: BPP Invited III: Gyrokinetic Modeling, Basic Shocks, EOS, and Laboratory Astrophysics
9:30 AM–12:30 PM,
Friday, November 9, 2018
OCC
Room: Oregon Ballroom 204
Chair: Mark Gilmore, University of New Mexico
Abstract ID: BAPS.2018.DPP.YI3.2
Abstract: YI3.00002 : Experimental Measurements of Ion Heating in Collisional Plasma Shocks and Interpenetrating Supersonic Plasma Flows*
10:00 AM–10:30 AM
Presenter:
Samuel Langendorf
(Los Alamos National Laboratory)
Author:
Samuel Langendorf
(Los Alamos National Laboratory)
On the Plasma Liner Experiment (PLX) at LANL, two coaxial-gun-formed, highly supersonic plasma jets (with initial n ∼ 1016 cm-3, Te ∼ Ti ∼ 1.5 eV, v = 25 – 80 km/s, diameter = 8.5 cm, length ≈ 20 cm) are merged obliquely to form either a strong collisional plasma shock or semi-collisional interpenetration without shock formation, depending on the merging angle. Earlier work presented detailed diagnostic measurements consistent with plasma-shock formation [2]. This work [3] presents new and comprehensive measurements of ion heating due to the colliding flows, for N, Ar, Kr, and Xe.
When the jet interpenetration length is much smaller than the jet scale size (∼20 cm), strong ion heating (inferred via high-resolution Doppler spectroscopy of ionized emission lines) to well above the electron temperature Te is observed, followed by cooling consistent with the classical equilibration rate. The peak observed ion temperature Ti (many tens of eV) is consistent with the post-shock prediction of collisional two-fluid plasma shock theory. When the jet interpenetration distance is comparable to the jet scale size, a diffuse plasma results with peak Ti well above Te but well below the predicted value of shock theory. This dataset presents an opportunity to validate first-principles multi-fluid and kinetic models of plasma shocks being implemented into a variety of modern codes; comparisons with multi-fluid simulations will also be presented.
2E. C. Merritt et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 085003 (2013).
3S. J. Langendorf et al., submitted (2018); https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.09933.
*In collaboration with S. Hsu, K. Yates, C. Thoma. We acknowledge HyperV Technologies for advice on plasma-gun operation. LA-UR-18-25692.
*This work was supported by the Office of Fusion Energy Sciences and the Advanced Research Projects Agency–Energy of the U.S. Dept. of Energy.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2018.DPP.YI3.2
Follow Us |
Engage
Become an APS Member |
My APS
Renew Membership |
Information for |
About APSThe American Physical Society (APS) is a non-profit membership organization working to advance the knowledge of physics. |
© 2024 American Physical Society
| All rights reserved | Terms of Use
| Contact Us
Headquarters
1 Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740-3844
(301) 209-3200
Editorial Office
100 Motor Pkwy, Suite 110, Hauppauge, NY 11788
(631) 591-4000
Office of Public Affairs
529 14th St NW, Suite 1050, Washington, D.C. 20045-2001
(202) 662-8700