Bulletin of the American Physical Society
60th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics
Volume 63, Number 11
Monday–Friday, November 5–9, 2018; Portland, Oregon
Session TP11: Poster Session VII: Basic Plasma Physics: Pure Electron Plasma, Strongly Coupled Plasmas, Self-Organization, Elementary Processes, Dusty Plasmas, Sheaths, Shocks, and Sources; Mini-conference on Nonlinear Waves and Processes in Space Plasmas - Posters; MHD and Stability, Transients (2), Runaway Electrons; NSTX-U; Spherical Tokamaks; Analytical and Computational Techniques; Diagnostics (9:30am-12:30pm)
Thursday, November 8, 2018
OCC
Room: Exhibit Hall A1&A
Abstract ID: BAPS.2018.DPP.TP11.111
Abstract: TP11.00111 : Predictive Modelling and Helicity Dissipation Scaling Studies for Local Helicity Injection Non-Solenoidal ST Startup*
Presenter:
J. D. Weberski
(University of Wisconsin-Madison)
Authors:
J. D. Weberski
(University of Wisconsin-Madison)
G. M. Bodner
(University of Wisconsin-Madison)
M. W. Bongard
(University of Wisconsin-Madison)
R. J. Fonck
(University of Wisconsin-Madison)
J. A. Reusch
(University of Wisconsin-Madison, University of Wisconsin-Madison)
A 0D power balance model is being tested on the Pegasus ST to develop predictive capability, interpret experiments, and inform future system design for Local Helicity Injection (LHI). The model calculates Ip(t) by balancing LHI effective drive (VLHI), helicity dissipation, and inductive effects while enforcing the Taylor relaxation current limit. Experimentally constrained drive inputs (plasma geometry, ℓi, βp, injector parameters) allow for prediction of upper bounds on Ip. Namely, predictive modeling suggests nonlinear increases in achievable Ip are possible by higher BT and/or Iinj to increase the early-phase Taylor limit. This motivates a new injector design and facility enhancements to further test LHI scalability. However, proper treatment of the helicity dissipation term is still a model uncertainty. Thus far, helicity dissipation has been attributed to neoclassical resistivity. This has been challenged by experiments showing Ip scales linearly with VLHI while Thomson scattering indicates a variety of Te profiles (from hollow to peaked, 40<Te,0 <150 eV) depending on BT, ne, and injector parameters. Systematic scaling studies of Te with discharge parameters are underway to resolve this model uncertainty.
*Work supported by US DOE grants DE-FG02-96ER54375 and DE-SC0006928.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2018.DPP.TP11.111
Follow Us |
Engage
Become an APS Member |
My APS
Renew Membership |
Information for |
About APSThe American Physical Society (APS) is a non-profit membership organization working to advance the knowledge of physics. |
© 2024 American Physical Society
| All rights reserved | Terms of Use
| Contact Us
Headquarters
1 Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740-3844
(301) 209-3200
Editorial Office
100 Motor Pkwy, Suite 110, Hauppauge, NY 11788
(631) 591-4000
Office of Public Affairs
529 14th St NW, Suite 1050, Washington, D.C. 20045-2001
(202) 662-8700