Bulletin of the American Physical Society
60th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics
Volume 63, Number 11
Monday–Friday, November 5–9, 2018; Portland, Oregon
Session NP11: Poster Session V: Laser-plasma Particle Acceleration; HEDP; Turbulence and Transport; DIII-D Tokamak; Machine Learning, Data Science (9:30am-12:30pm)
Wednesday, November 7, 2018
OCC
Room: Exhibit Hall A1&A
Abstract ID: BAPS.2018.DPP.NP11.116
Abstract: NP11.00116 : Comparison of initial poloidal impurity distributions for MGI, SPI, and dual SPI plasma shutdowns.*
Presenter:
J. L. Herfindal
(Oak Ridge National Lab)
Authors:
J. L. Herfindal
(Oak Ridge National Lab)
D. Shiraki
(Oak Ridge National Lab)
L. R. Baylor
(Oak Ridge National Lab)
E. M. Hollmann
(Univ of California - San Diego)
R. A. Moyer
(Univ of California - San Diego)
N. W. Eidietis
(General Atomics - San Diego)
T. Odstrcil
(Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
A comparison of the pre-thermal quench radiation profiles due to high-Z impurity injection by massive gas injection (MGI), shattered pellet injection (SPI), and dual SPI from different toroidal locations into the same plasma is presented. Two different injection locations on the low-field side either above or below the midplane for MGI mitigated plasmas confirm previously found results that injection above the midplane flows inboard towards the high-field side prior to the thermal quench while MGI injection below the midplane remains trapped and even flows in the opposite direction towards the X-point.[1] Two SPI systems on DIII-D allow for comparison of impurity flows along field lines pitched towards the high or low-field side. These comparisons show that unlike MGI, the impurities are deposited inside the pedestal and are more constrained to the field lines resulting in less poloidal spreading. Tomography reconstructions of radiated power measurements for dual SPIs fired at different toroidal locations show cooling of multiple flux tubes which could explain the observed difference in mitigation metrics compared to single SPI experiments.
[1] Eidietis, N. W, et al., PoP 24, 102504 (2017)
*Supported by the US DOE under DE-AC05-00OR22725, DE-FG02-07ER54917, and DE-FC02-04ER54698
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2018.DPP.NP11.116
Follow Us |
Engage
Become an APS Member |
My APS
Renew Membership |
Information for |
About APSThe American Physical Society (APS) is a non-profit membership organization working to advance the knowledge of physics. |
© 2024 American Physical Society
| All rights reserved | Terms of Use
| Contact Us
Headquarters
1 Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740-3844
(301) 209-3200
Editorial Office
100 Motor Pkwy, Suite 110, Hauppauge, NY 11788
(631) 591-4000
Office of Public Affairs
529 14th St NW, Suite 1050, Washington, D.C. 20045-2001
(202) 662-8700