Bulletin of the American Physical Society
60th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics
Volume 63, Number 11
Monday–Friday, November 5–9, 2018; Portland, Oregon
Session CP11: Poster Session II: Basic Plasma Physics; Boundary, PMI, Proto-MPEX; International Tokamaks; Turbulence and Transport; Other Configurations; Z-pinch, Dense Plasma Focus and MagLIF (2:00pm-5:00pm)
Monday, November 5, 2018
OCC
Room: Exhibit Hall A1&A
Abstract ID: BAPS.2018.DPP.CP11.102
Abstract: CP11.00102 : Interpretive and predictive transport analyses of KSTAR plasmas supporting disruption event characterization and forecasting*
Presenter:
Jaeheon Ahn
(Columbia Univ)
Authors:
Jaeheon Ahn
(Columbia Univ)
Steven A Sabbagh
(Columbia Univ)
Young-Seok Park
(Columbia Univ)
John W Berkery
(Columbia Univ)
Yanzheng Jiang
(Columbia Univ)
Juan D Riquezes
(Columbia Univ)
Mark D Boyer
(PPPL)
Francesca M Poli
(PPPL)
Steve D Scott
(PPPL)
Jisung Kang
(NFRI)
Hyungho Lee
(NFRI)
Laurent Terzolo
(NFRI)
Sonjong Wang
(NFRI)
Alan H Glasser
(Fusion Theory and Computation, Inc.)
KSTAR plasmas have reached high stability parameters (normalized beta βN reaching 4.3) at relatively low plasma internal inductance li (βN/li>6), including operation at high βN > βNno-wall [1]. Transport analyses are conducted to best understand a disruption-free path toward the design target of βN=5 while aiming to maximize the non-inductive current fraction fNI. Interpretive analysis using the TRANSP code indicates that fNI in existing KSTAR plasmas can reach up to 75%. It also shows that the bootstrap and total non-inductive current profiles can vary significantly with fNI across the regimes. The predictive capability of the TRANSP code is used to examine the effects of the second NBI system installed on KSTAR for the 2018 run determining plasma parameters and profiles important for plasma stability. Values of the global energy confinement quality (H98y2) and the Greenwald density fraction are set to match past KSTAR performance for reliable extrapolation. These ‘predict-first’ analyses are used to design 2018 high-β experiments yielding solutions with βN~4.5 at fNI~100%. Ideal and resistive stability of MHD modes is evaluated using the DCON code.
[1] Y.S. Park, S.A. Sabbagh, et al., Phys. Plasmas 24 (2017) 012512.
*Work supported by U.S. DoE grant DE-SC0016614.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2018.DPP.CP11.102
Follow Us |
Engage
Become an APS Member |
My APS
Renew Membership |
Information for |
About APSThe American Physical Society (APS) is a non-profit membership organization working to advance the knowledge of physics. |
© 2024 American Physical Society
| All rights reserved | Terms of Use
| Contact Us
Headquarters
1 Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740-3844
(301) 209-3200
Editorial Office
100 Motor Pkwy, Suite 110, Hauppauge, NY 11788
(631) 591-4000
Office of Public Affairs
529 14th St NW, Suite 1050, Washington, D.C. 20045-2001
(202) 662-8700