Bulletin of the American Physical Society
60th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics
Volume 63, Number 11
Monday–Friday, November 5–9, 2018; Portland, Oregon
Session BO7: Measurements and Diagnostics in Inertial Confinement Fusion
9:30 AM–12:30 PM,
Monday, November 5, 2018
OCC
Room: B117-119
Chair: Dan Casey, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Abstract ID: BAPS.2018.DPP.BO7.2
Abstract: BO7.00002 : Inferring Hot-Spot Electron Temperature from X-Ray Continuum Emission
9:42 AM–9:54 AM
Presenter:
Duc M Cao
(Laboratory for Laser Energetics, U. of Rochester)
Authors:
Duc M Cao
(Laboratory for Laser Energetics, U. of Rochester)
Rahul C Shah
(Laboratory for Laser Energetics, U. of Rochester)
Sean P Regan
(Laboratory for Laser Energetics, U. of Rochester)
Reuben Epstein
(Laboratory for Laser Energetics, U. of Rochester)
Chuck Sorce
(Laboratory for Laser Energetics, U. of Rochester)
Wolfgang R. Theobald
(Laboratory for Laser Energetics, U. of Rochester)
P.B Radha
(Laboratory for Laser Energetics, U. of Rochester)
Valeri N Goncharov
(Laboratory for Laser Energetics, U. of Rochester)
The measured burn-weighted hot-spot ion temperature (Ti) is used as a key implosion performance metric, but it can be biased by motional blurring. To avoid this effect, the inverse slope of the x‑ray continuum emission spectrum will be used instead to infer a hot-spot electron temperature (Te). At a chosen photon energy, this inferred Te is exactly equal to the emission-weighted harmonic mean of the hot-spot Te. Near 15-keV spectral energy, the emission weighting is closest to burn weighting. For OMEGA-scale implosions, however, simulations indicate that correlation is too poor between the inferred Te and burn-weighted Ti for Ti measurement surrogacy because of the non-equilibrium state between Te and Ti. The inferred Te will therefore be treated as an independent metric to constrain post-shot simulations. Absolute emission measurements will also be used to infer the amount of hot-spot mix. In contrast to previous methods,1,2 a non-equilibrium temperature state and the inclusion of a Te measurement will be assumed. This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration under Award Number DE-NA0001944.
1 R. Epstein et. al., Phys. Plasmas 22, 022707 (2015).
2 T. Ma et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 085004 (2013).
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2018.DPP.BO7.2
Follow Us |
Engage
Become an APS Member |
My APS
Renew Membership |
Information for |
About APSThe American Physical Society (APS) is a non-profit membership organization working to advance the knowledge of physics. |
© 2025 American Physical Society
| All rights reserved | Terms of Use
| Contact Us
Headquarters
1 Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740-3844
(301) 209-3200
Editorial Office
100 Motor Pkwy, Suite 110, Hauppauge, NY 11788
(631) 591-4000
Office of Public Affairs
529 14th St NW, Suite 1050, Washington, D.C. 20045-2001
(202) 662-8700