58th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics
Volume 61, Number 18
Monday–Friday, October 31–November 4 2016;
San Jose, California
Session NI2: Stix Award and ICF: Implosion Stagnation
9:30 AM–12:30 PM,
Wednesday, November 2, 2016
Room: 210 CDGH
Chair: Sean Regan, University of Rochester
Abstract ID: BAPS.2016.DPP.NI2.6
Abstract: NI2.00006 : BigFoot, a program to reduce risk for indirect drive laser fusion*
12:00 PM–12:30 PM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Cliff Thomas
(Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)
The conventional approach to inertial confinement fusion (ICF) is to
maximize compressibility, or, total areal density. To achieve high
convergence (40), the laser pulse is shaped to launch a weak first shock,
which is followed in turn by 2-3 stronger shocks. Importantly, this has an
outsized effect on integrated target physics, as the time it takes the
shocks to transit the shell is related to hohlraum wall motion and filling,
and can contribute to difficulties achieving an implosion that is fast,
tunable, and/or predictable. At its outset, this approach attempts to
predict the tradeoff in capsule and hohlraum physics in a case that is
challenging, and assumes the hotspot can still reach the temperature and
density necessary to self-heat (4-5 keV and 0.1-0.2 g/cm$^{2}$,
respectively). Here, we consider an alternate route to fusion ignition, for
which the benefits of predictability, control, and coupling could exceed the
benefits of convergence. In this approach we avoid uncertainty, and instead,
seek a target that is predictable. To simplify hohlraum physics and limit
wall motion we keep the implosion time short (6-7 ns), and design the target
to avoid laser-plasma instabilities. Whereas the previous focus was on
density, it is now on making a 1D hotspot at low convergence (20) that is
robust with respect to alpha heating (5-6 keV, and 0.2-0.3 g/cm$^{2})$. At
present, we estimate the tradeoff between convergence and control is
relatively flat, and advantages in coupling enable high velocity (450-500
um/ns) and high yield (1E17). Were the approach successful, we believe it
could reduce barriers to progress, as further improvements could be made
with small, incremental increases in areal density. Details regarding the
``BigFoot'' platform and pulse are reported, as well as initial experiments.
Work that could enable additional improvements in laser power, laser
control, and capsule stability will also be discussed.
*This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy
by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2016.DPP.NI2.6