58th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics
Volume 61, Number 18
Monday–Friday, October 31–November 4 2016;
San Jose, California
Session DI2: Electron Holes and Reconnection
3:00 PM–5:00 PM,
Monday, October 31, 2016
Room: 210 CDGH
Chair: William Amatucci, Naval Research Laboratory
Abstract ID: BAPS.2016.DPP.DI2.1
Abstract: DI2.00001 : Helicity Transformation under the Collision and Merging of Magnetic Flux Ropes*
3:00 PM–3:30 PM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Timothy DeHaas
(University of California, Los Angeles)
A magnetic flux rope is a tube-like, current carrying plasma embedded in an
external magnetic field. The magnetic field lines resemble threads in a
rope, which vary in pitch according to radius. Flux ropes are ubiquitous in
astrophysical plasmas, and bundles of these structures play an important
role in the dynamics of the space environment. They are observed in the
solar atmosphere [1] and near-earth environment [2] where they are seen to
twist, merge, tear, and writhe. In this MHD context, their global dynamics
are bound by rules of magnetic helicity conservation, unless, under a
non-ideal process, helicity is transformed through magnetic reconnection,
turbulence, or localized instabilities. These processes are tested under
experimental conditions in the Large Plasma Device (LAPD). The device is a
twenty-meter long, one-meter diameter, cylindrical vacuum vessel designed to
generate a highly reproducible, magnetized plasma. Reliable shot-to-shot
repetition of plasma parameters and over four hundred diagnostic ports
enable the collection of volumetric datasets (measurements of
n$_{\mathrm{e}}$, T$_{\mathrm{e}}$, V$_{\mathrm{p}}$, \textbf{B},
\textbf{J}, \textbf{E}, \textbf{u}$_{\mathrm{\mathbf{flow}}})$ as two
kink-unstable flux ropes form, move, collide, and merge. Similar experiments
on the LAPD have utilized these volumetric datasets, visualizing magnetic
reconnection through a topological quasi-separatrix layer, or QSL [3]. This
QSL is shown to be spatially coincident with the reconnection rate [4],
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\centerline{\includegraphics[width=0.43in,height=0.17in]{150720161.eps}}
\label{fig1}
\end{figure}
$\int {E\cdot dl} ,$ and oscillates (although out of phase) with global
helicity. Magnetic helicity is observed to have a negative sign and its
counterpart, cross helicity, a positive one. These quantities oscillate
8{\%} peak-to-peak, and the changes in helicity are visualized as 1) the
transport of helicity $(\phi B+E\times A)$ and 2) the dissipation of the
helicity $-2E\cdot B$.
[1] J. W. Cirtain, \textit{et al}. Nature 493, 501--503 (2013).
[2] P.D. Henderson, \textit{et al}. Ann. Geophys., 24, 651 (2006)
[3] W. Gekelman, \textit{et al.} ApJ, 753:131, (2012)
[4] W. Gekelmen, \textit{et al. }Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 235101 (2016)
*This work is supported by LANL-UC research grant and done at the Basic Plasma Science Facility, which is funded by DOE and NSF.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2016.DPP.DI2.1