53rd Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics
Volume 56, Number 16
Monday–Friday, November 14–18, 2011;
Salt Lake City, Utah
Session PI2: Pedestal, SOL and Divertor
2:00 PM–5:00 PM,
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
Room: Ballroom BD
Chair: Vlad Soukhanovskii, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Abstract ID: BAPS.2011.DPP.PI2.3
Abstract: PI2.00003 : H-mode Pedestal Evolution in ELMy and ELM-free discharges in NSTX*
3:00 PM–3:30 PM
Preview Abstract
Abstract
Author:
Ahmed Diallo
(Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory)
Most tokamaks operate in ELMy H-mode, since
ELM-free regimes typically have narrow and transient operational
windows. In
contrast, in NSTX, sustained ELM-free regimes are routinely
accessed with a
wide operating window by evaporating lithium onto the divertor
plates
between discharges [1]. In this work, we use this widened
operating window
to investigate the governing physics of the pedestal density,
temperature,
and pressure profiles. As part of the FY11 DoE multi-facility
Joint Research
Target, we contrast the pedestal structure evolution, transport, and
fluctuations in ELMy and ELM-free regimes, building on previous
studies [2].
Counter to intuition, the pedestal pressure width and height are
found to be
larger in ELM-free than ELMy discharges. During the inter-ELM
phase in ELMy
discharges, the pedestal pressure height saturates early in the
ELM cycle
and the maximum pressure gradient is clamped around 20{\%} of the
ELM cycle,
similar in part to DIII-D observations [3]. Meanwhile the
pedestal width
continues to expand until the onset of ELMs [4]. The inter-ELM edge
fluctuations, using BES and reflectometer measurements in the
pedestal
region, show a decrease of the fluctuations just prior to the
onset of the
ELM. This reduction of edge fluctuations is sustained when
transitioning to
ELM-free regimes. In the ELM-free discharges, the electron
density pedestal
width and height grow slowly with time, while the electron pedestal
temperature appears clamped; hence, the pedestal pressure also
grows slowly,
evolving to a favorable parabolic-shaped profile. Nevertheless,
peeling-ballooning theory appears to set an upper limit to the
pressure
gradients in both ELM-free and ELMy discharges.\\[4pt]
[1] H. Kugel, et al. Phys. of Plasmas \textbf{15} (2008)
056118\\[0pt]
[2] J. Canik, et al., Phys. of Plamas \textbf{18} (2011)
056118\\[0pt]
[3] R. Groebner, et al. Nucl. Fusion \textbf{4} (2009)
064002\\[0pt]
[4] A. Diallo, et al. Nucl. Fusion \textbf{50} (2011)
\textit{at press}
*Work supported by US DOE contract no.~DE-AC02-09CH11466.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2011.DPP.PI2.3