Bulletin of the American Physical Society
75th Annual Meeting of the Division of Fluid Dynamics
Volume 67, Number 19
Sunday–Tuesday, November 20–22, 2022; Indiana Convention Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Session A21: Turbulence: Machine Learning Methods for Turbulence Modeling I
8:00 AM–9:57 AM,
Sunday, November 20, 2022
Room: 208
Chair: Pedram Hassanzadeh, Rice University
Abstract: A21.00008 : Accurate Deep Learning sub-grid scale models for large eddy simulations
9:31 AM–9:44 AM
Presenter:
Rikhi Bose
(National Institute of Standards & Technology)
Authors:
Rikhi Bose
(National Institute of Standards & Technology)
Arunabha M Roy
(Aerospace Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109)
To this end, robust and efficient Deep Learning (DL) algorithms have been used because of their superior capability in establishing high-order complex non-linear relations between the input features and output variables, which may be out of the scope of the state-of-the-art conventional modeling strategies.
Accuracy of the input and output features is important to formulate accurate DL models, and therefore, data from direct simulations of the canonical channel flow at friction Reynolds numbers Reτ≈ 395 and 590 are used for training and testing.
The DNS data is filtered in all three spatial directions.
Two training strategies are adopted.
In one of these, the scalar coefficients corresponding to the five symmetric integrity basis tensors (Lund & Novikov, 1992) are the target variables.
The DL models approximate these coefficients based on the six scalar invariants as the input features computed from the filtered strain rate and rotation rate tensors, and terms computed from their higher powers.
In another strategy, all of the aforementioned variables (six scalar invariants, and the six independent components of each of the five integrity basis tensors; 36 in total) are fed to the Neural Networks (NNs) to directly predict the six target SGS stress components.
While the former strategy results in excellent agreements between the statistical distributions of the truth and the predictions for all six stress components, the latter strategy results in a significantly reduced mean-squared-error (m.s.e. obtained is at least half of that obtained with the first strategy) upon the convergence of the models in apriori testing.
The latter strategy also yields significantly higher correlation coefficients with the true SGS stresses.
The models are being implemented in LES codes for a-posteriori testing.
Follow Us |
Engage
Become an APS Member |
My APS
Renew Membership |
Information for |
About APSThe American Physical Society (APS) is a non-profit membership organization working to advance the knowledge of physics. |
© 2024 American Physical Society
| All rights reserved | Terms of Use
| Contact Us
Headquarters
1 Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740-3844
(301) 209-3200
Editorial Office
100 Motor Pkwy, Suite 110, Hauppauge, NY 11788
(631) 591-4000
Office of Public Affairs
529 14th St NW, Suite 1050, Washington, D.C. 20045-2001
(202) 662-8700