2006 59th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Fluid Dynamics
Sunday–Tuesday, November 19–21, 2006;
Tampa Bay, Florida
Session NA: Invited Lecture: Formulation and Results from Ensemble Forecasting using Multimodels for Hurricanes, Global Weather and Seasonal Climate
11:30 AM–12:10 PM,
Tuesday, November 21, 2006
Tampa Marriott Waterside Hotel and Marina
Room: Grand Salon E
Chair: Annick Pouquet, National Center for Atmospheric Research
Abstract ID: BAPS.2006.DFD.NA.1
Abstract: NA.00001 : Formulation and results from ensemble forecasting using Multimodels for Hurricanes, Global Weather and Seasonal Climate
11:30 AM–12:10 PM
Preview Abstract
Author:
T.N. Krishnamurthi
(Department of Meterology, Florida State University)
This paper carries a short review of a multimodel/multianalysis
superensemble for weather and seasonal climate forecasts. This
model was
first developed by the authors in 1999 at Florida State
University. This
entails a large number of forecasts using these multimodels from
past data
sets, that is called a training phase of the superensemble.
During this
training phase statistical relation among the model forecasts and the
observed fields is obtained using multiple regression methods.
This training
phase requires roughly 4 months of past daily forecasts for numerical
weather prediction (NWP), approximately 6 years of past seasonal
forecast
and about 60 past hurricane/typhoon/tropical cyclone forecasts
from each of
the participating member models. The training phase is followed by a
forecast phase where the member model forecasts (into the future)
use the
aforementioned statistics to construct multimodel superensemble
forecasts.
Our focus on NWP has been to examine the performance of the
multimodel
superensemble forecast against those of the member models, their
ensemble
mean and the bias removed ensemble means. We have noted an
invariable much
superior performance of the multimodel superensemble. We have
noted that
roughly a minimal number of 7 to 8 models are needed to carry out
this
exercise. We were also able to improve the database and the
statistics of
the training phase by rejecting poorer forecast days and
optimizing the
number of training days. The common metrics for forecast
evaluation include
root mean square error, anomaly correlation and equitable threat
scores.
Great impact on real time and experimental forecasts from the
superensemble
were noted for precipitation, sea level pressure, temperature and
500 hPa
geopotential height fields. The improvements in forecasting heavy
rains by
the multimodel/multianalysis superensemble are found to provide
useful
guidance in flood events. In hurricane forecasts improvements in
track
position forecasts of the order of 100 to 250 km were noted in
one to three
day forecasts. Intensity forecast for hurricanes shows only a
marginal
improvement. The seasonal climate forecasts show a lower
performance from
the member models compared to climatology, the multimodel
superensemble
appears to have skill somewhat above that of climatology.
To cite this abstract, use the following reference: http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2006.DFD.NA.1