Bulletin of the American Physical Society
2010 Annual Meeting of the California-Nevada Section of the APS
Volume 55, Number 12
Friday–Saturday, October 29–30, 2010; Pasadena, California
Session H3: Multidisciplinary Research |
Hide Abstracts |
Chair: Karl van Bibber, Naval Postgraduate School Room: Building 47, Downs Laboratory of Physics, Classroom 107 |
Saturday, October 30, 2010 1:00PM - 1:12PM |
H3.00001: The Unified Field of Energy Is A Physical Structure, Filling up ALL KNOWN and KNOWABLE SPACE/TIME. The Physical Operating System of the Universe. Alfy S. Sourial A Standard Elementary Particle, ``SEP'' - of certain specifications - is being suggested as: The plausible building unit of ``A Material structure for Spacetime: the Aether.'' At the same time it physically represents the Unified Field of Energy. The thesis reintroduces the theory of ``A Material Aether'', and Defines its possible structure as: A necessary and mandatory medium for the Execution of ALL PHYSICAL PROCESSES: Thus starting, a new language of Physics: THE LOGISTICS OF PHYSICS. Such physical structure PREDATES THE BIG BANG. The Big Bang can only happen inside a pressure cooker created by the material Aether's shear Inertia. The same ``Standard Elementary Particle,'' is being suggested as a plausible origin of: All Simple Subatomic Particles, of Conventional Matter: [the current 200-odd], and their derivation from such a standard particle, through minor modification of their: Orientation, Degree of Compression, Rate of Spin, and Degree of ``Freedom of Motion,'' depending on its surroundings. Compound Subatomic Particles such as ``Baryons'' are a combination of two, three or four of such modified ``Standard Elementary Particles.'' Bound together in a specific way, around A central non spinning SEP: ``Higgs Boson,'' the Author's ``Noumenon''. Clumps of Higgs Bosons as the origin of Dark Matter and Galactic Black Holes. Incidentally, It is impossible to isolate Higgs Boson, Without creating a Baryon. [Preview Abstract] |
Saturday, October 30, 2010 1:12PM - 1:24PM |
H3.00002: Comparison of Two Models Harold Fairweather, Kenneth Ganezer A comparison of two different models for nuclear effects in oxygen-16 from the propagation of mesonic secondaries of neutron oscillations. In order to estimate uncertainties due to the reliability of the models, two such algorithms with slightly different physics assumptions and approaches were compared for various kinematic variables and interaction rates. We found that the differences in values of these parameters were very small and that the related distribution as approximately (1-2\%) in the form of histograms and scatter plots were similar. We concluded that the differences between our two models with different but reasonable physical assumptions were relatively small and the models were both reliable. Our study validated earlier estimates of the nuclear model with dependent systematic errors in our neutron oscillation search to be 2\%. [Preview Abstract] |
Saturday, October 30, 2010 1:24PM - 1:36PM |
H3.00003: Connection between `unparticle' and `unmatter' Ervin Goldfain, Florentin Smarandache The connection between `unparticle' and`unmatter' is as follows. Unparticles have very odd properties which result from the fact that they represent fractional field quanta. Unparticles are manifested as mixed states that contain arbitrary mixtures of particles and antiparticles (therefore they simultaneously evolve ``forward'' and ``backward'' in time). From this, the connection with unmatter (since unmatter is formed by particles and antiparticles). Using the fractal operators of differentiation and integration we get the connection between unparticle and unmatter. `Unmatter' was coined by F. Smarandache in 2004 in CERN's website; he published three papers on the subject. [Preview Abstract] |
Saturday, October 30, 2010 1:36PM - 1:48PM |
H3.00004: A knot theory of physics, spacetime in co-dimension 2 Clifford Ellgen Attempts to describe particles as topological phenomena go back at least as far as Kelvin's conjecture that atoms are knots in the ether. A modern parallel is to ask whether the spacetime manifold of general relativity can be knotted and what properties those knots might have. However, if the manifold is everywhere Lorentzian, then a change of the topology of a spacelike slice of spacetime requires violation of causality. A consistent model emerges if we assume that the spacetime manifold is a 4-dimensional manifold embedded in a 6-dimensional Minkowski space and that each spacelike slice of the manifold has finite energy. A finite energy embedding allows the metric on the manifold to be degenerate on a set of measure zero, therefore the manifold may not be everywhere Lorentzian, which allows for certain types of topology change. An n-dimensional manifold embedded in an n+2-dimensional space can be knotted. We show that the possible knots on the spacetime manifold have properties corresponding to the known elementary particles. If we include the electromagnetic potential then we can use a simple Lagrangian to describe all of the forces including gravity. A simple extension of the assumptions produces quantum field theory. [Preview Abstract] |
Saturday, October 30, 2010 1:48PM - 2:00PM |
H3.00005: Mass as the Statistical Orign of Geometry and Dynamics Geoffrey Holstrom Mass has a performance in a geometry, but it starts without one. It comes from a space of formation intervals. A probability distribution exists,with mass as the intensive parameter. There is no geometry. Two formation interval spaces are taken. Bridge connections relate them. At a determined union, one forms a neutrino, the other a massive particle. There are four connection operators, three anti-symmetric, one symmetric. Particles come from these four. The anti-symmetric ones are separate, in analogy to color. Symmetric ones exist together. Three neutrinos and six quarks are possible. Mass operators are in formation interval space, along with those for Maxwell fields. Once a mass exists, a geometry is possible. Units of mass are one over length. The coordinate is time. At undetermined unions, no mass is made. There is no time. Using the full Riemann and conformal tensors, a source from the anti-symmetric connections can be used. A spherical collection acts like gravity. One, on a scale of fm, is strong and might bind particles. Mass also allows time as the extensive variable, modifying large scale gravity. [Preview Abstract] |
Saturday, October 30, 2010 2:00PM - 2:12PM |
H3.00006: Retro-causal Holographic Dark Energy Coherent Vacuum Super-Solid Tetrad Emergent Gravity Jack Sarfatti Frictionless irrotational flow in superfluid helium comes from the gradient of a single Goldstone phase in the spontaneous broken U1 symmetry ground state, so too the four gravity tetrad and six spin connection Einstein-Cartan 1-form fields come from eight SU3 Goldstone phases of the post-inflation macro-quantum coherent 4D super-solid ``world crystal lattice'' QCD vacuum superconductor. Wheeler-Feynman's advanced potential, Hoyle-Narlikar's future influence functional, Cramer's ``transaction'' and Aharonov's pre-selection history/post-selection destiny double quantum state vector lead to the hologram idea that our interior bulk accelerating comoving spacelike slice 3D cosmological metric expansion rate in conformal time is a dynamical 3D back-from-the-future (final cause) retro-causal holographic image of 2D surface fractional quantum statistical anyonic qubit patterns on our observer-dependent thermal future de Sitter (dS) event horizon whose asymptotically constant area/entropy is the reciprocal dark energy density. [Preview Abstract] |
Saturday, October 30, 2010 2:12PM - 2:24PM |
H3.00007: Consciousness can reduce the voltage of the output signal of solar cell Dayong Cao When the sun's light radiate on the solar cell, the solar cell can produce the output signal as the photocurrent. We use the Data Acquisition Modules to record the voltage of the output signals. The v1 is voltage of the output signal of solar cell1; The v2 is the one of solar cell2. And these two solar cells stay side by side. When we record the voltage of the output signal from the morning to the noon, the voltage of the output signals will go up, and the v1 is bigger than the v2 during this time. But when the experimenter use consciousness to reduce the voltage of the output signals. That is to say: not only natural light ratiade on two solar cells, but also consciousness act on two solar cells. Not only I can use consciousness to reduce the growth voltage of the output signals, but also can change the v1 to be littler than the v2. The experiment was conducted on Sep. 2010. There is the physical system of the mass, energy, space and time-MEST; There is the spirited system of the mind, consciousness, emotion and desire-MECD; the information system is the code system. We can use them to develop photoelectric principle, life technology and Nanotech of semiconductor for consciousness effect. [Preview Abstract] |
Saturday, October 30, 2010 2:24PM - 2:36PM |
H3.00008: Tidal Forces: A Different Theory Roy Masters We revisit the theories describing the moon raising the tides by virtue of pull gravity combined with the moon's centripetal angular momentum. We show that if gravity is considered as the attractive interaction between individual bodies, then the moon would have fallen to earth eons ago. Isaac Newton's laws of motion cannot work with pull gravity. However, they do with gravity as a property of the universe as Einstein said with a huge energy bonus. In other words, the moon-Earth system becomes the first observable vacuum gravity energy machine, meaning that it not only produces energy, but provides also escape momentum for the moon's centripetal motion at 4cm per year. [Preview Abstract] |
Saturday, October 30, 2010 2:36PM - 2:48PM |
H3.00009: P=/=NP Category-Semantics(C-S) TRIVIAL Proof: EUCLID!!! [(So Miscalled) ``Computational''-``Complexity"(CC) Jargonial-Obfuscation(J-O); (Which???)MillenniumED-ProblemED(M-P): NO CC, "CS" Feet of Clay!!!] Edward Siegel, London Clay P=/=NP M-P proof is by C-S J-O elimination! C-S P=(?)=NP MEANS (Deterministic).(P-C)=(?)=(NON-D).(P-C)=(NP). C-S P=(?)=NP MEANS (Deterministic). (P-C)=(?)=(Non-D).(P-C) i.e. D.(P)=(?)= N.(P). For inclusion(equality) vs. exclusion(inequality), ir-relevant(P)simply cancels! (Equally any other CC IF both sides identical). Crucial question left(D)=(?)=(N-D), i.e. D =(?)= N. Algorithmics: Deterministic (D) serial vs. Non-deterministic (N) NON-serial, branch fork forms a triangle, its vertices a plane. Menger Dimension-Theory: Dimensionality: D serial is one-dimensional, dim(D) = 1 (definition), versus N non-serial is $>$ one-dimensional, dim(N) = 2(branching; fork; triangle; plane)+ E(probabilistic)$>$ 2 [Sipser [Intro. to Thy. of Comp., PWS Pub. Co.(1997)-p. 49; Fig. 1.15!!!]]. Hence(Euclid[-300 BCE])by simple formative geometry, dim(D) = 1 =/= dim(N) = 2(branching)+ E(probabilistic) $>$ 2, Left-to-Right INclusion VERSUS Right-to-Left EXclusion. Hence P =/= NP!!! QED, i.e. D =/= N, i.e. dim(D) = 1 =/= dim(N) = 2(branching)+ E(probabilistic)$>$ 2 by first millennium BCE, before ``CS'' J-O of CC!!! Harder proofs, but still amenable to FUZZYICS C-S J-O analysis, are any combinations with DIS-similar CCs, especially LHS combining D with low CC and/or RHS combining N with high CC! [Preview Abstract] |
Follow Us |
Engage
Become an APS Member |
My APS
Renew Membership |
Information for |
About APSThe American Physical Society (APS) is a non-profit membership organization working to advance the knowledge of physics. |
© 2024 American Physical Society
| All rights reserved | Terms of Use
| Contact Us
Headquarters
1 Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740-3844
(301) 209-3200
Editorial Office
100 Motor Pkwy, Suite 110, Hauppauge, NY 11788
(631) 591-4000
Office of Public Affairs
529 14th St NW, Suite 1050, Washington, D.C. 20045-2001
(202) 662-8700