Bulletin of the American Physical Society
APS April Meeting 2014
Volume 59, Number 5
Saturday–Tuesday, April 5–8, 2014; Savannah, Georgia
Session Y9: New Directions in Astrophysics |
Hide Abstracts |
Sponsoring Units: DAP Chair: John Beacom, The Ohio State University Room: 203 |
Tuesday, April 8, 2014 1:30PM - 1:42PM |
Y9.00001: New Explain of Hubble's Red Shift Dayong Cao In Dopple's frequency shift, there is a Lorentz Factor of the Einstein's Lorentz transformation. So the mobile light source can cause the Einstein's Lorentz transformation both of the frequency and the wavelength ?such as the quantum space-time? of the light. The paper supposes that the traveled light can cause the Einstein's Lorentz transformation both of the frequency and the wavelength of the light too. According to Dopple Effect, Hubble's Red Shift and the new idea, \begin{equation} H_0\approx\frac{\lambda_{shift}}{D}\Delta\nu\approx\frac{t_{shift}}{T}\Delta\nu\approx\frac{\nu_{rest}\lambda_{shift}-c}{D}\approx\frac{\nu_{rest}t_{shift}-c}{T} \end{equation} \begin{equation} a\approx{H_0^2D}\approx{-g} \end{equation} Among it, $H_0$: is the Hubble's constant, $\lambda_{shift}$: is the shifted wavelength of a particular spectral line, The wavelength is as quantum space, $\nu_{shift}$: is the shifted frequency of a particular spectral line, t: is the ${1}/{\nu}$. The $``t''$ is as the quantum time, $t_{shift}$: is the ${1}/{\nu_{shift}}$, D: is the direct distance from observer to the star (traveled distance of the light ), T: is the traveled time of the light, $\Delta\nu$; is the remainder between the $\nu_{shift}$ and the $\nu_{rest}$, c: is the speed of the light, a: is the acceleration which is produced by the light radiation, g: is the acceleration of gravity. Accroding to the above equations, the $H_0$ has a relationship with the ${\lambda_{shift}}/{D}$ or ${t_{shift}}/{T}$; Hubble's RedShift effect equal a acceleration of a space-time field (as a negative acceleration field of gravity). When the light travels, its quantum space-time is expanded. (Cao Dayong, MEST-The universe has not the time arrowhead and space expanding, http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2012.APR.E1.2, and New explanation of Hubble's redshift, http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2012.DNP.CG.6) [Preview Abstract] |
Tuesday, April 8, 2014 1:42PM - 1:54PM |
Y9.00002: A Second Dimension of Time Explains Quantum and Classical Fields Richard Kriske This author had previously proposed that there is a Second Dimension of Time. The two times do not Commute. Usually when one says two things don't Commute one does not mean the dimensions themselves, although E does not commute with t, and one usually means that take the E operator first and then the t operator is not the same as taking the t operator then the E. Of course in that very statement is a puzzle since it involves t itself. What if t(clock) and t(information) do not commute, what that means is take t(clock) and t(information) at a point in x, is not the same as taking t(clock) and t(information) at a different point;Which is a Field and Special Relativity. So suddenly you can see that Fields arise because there are two non-commuting dimensions of time. Since the times are symmetric, what is Conserved Quantity between them? It can't be Energy, but rather Energy total--One Energy for Clock Time, and one Energy for Information Time. The Total Energy has an interesting property, as the two Dimension of Time result in a totally Geometrical Theory,with only the two time Dimensions themselve having a Quantum Character. Position and Momentum, Energy and time Commute with two Dimensions of time, as do their ``Dark'' conterparts. The Conservation ``makes'' the other Dimension [Preview Abstract] |
Tuesday, April 8, 2014 1:54PM - 2:06PM |
Y9.00003: Experimental observation of dark matter and formation of mini-galaxies at zero speed-of-light Meggie Zhang The deformation of the light from a source, such as a galaxy or star, into Einstein rings through gravitational lensing of the source's light by an object with an extremely large mass. Such rings help in understanding the distribution of dark matter. Here we experimentally demonstrate how Einstein ring are formed and in what nature dark matter is. Through the experimental observation of the structure of dark matter, we propose reinterpretation of quantum mechanic and modification to relativity theory to arrive an unified theory which provided a new understanding about the nature of gravity, mass and mass gap. To verify this work we experimentally demonstrated the formation of ``mini-planets'' and ``mini-galaxies.'' [Preview Abstract] |
Tuesday, April 8, 2014 2:06PM - 2:18PM |
Y9.00004: Creator God Rules The Universe Because Hawking Built The Big Bang On A Foundation Of Quicksand Robert Gentry Hawking is the world's premier big bang cosmologist; his compatriots, vast in number, have repeatedly checked all he ever wrote. They would have discovered it earlier if he had blundered even slightly. Thus it's impossible that he built the big bang on a foundation of quicksand. So the final verdict must be that Hawking is the winner and the God of Genesis is the loser. Despite this cosmological unanimity, we will show that Hawking and all his compatriots are guilty of that blunder and hence are now destined to collectively reap the consequences of having made it. And further that neither they nor their many followers will understand this blunder until learning of it in our presentation. Only then will they realize that Hawking and others did build the big bang on a false gravitational redshift foundation, one that in one crucial respect so closely imitates the physics of the actual gravitational redshift that neither Hawking -- nor any of the millions of his followers -- ever suspected they were all being flummoxed into accepting the greatest scientific debacle of all time. Our presentation reveals how this false foundational assumption of in-flight wavelength expansion was identified, and why its discovery led to big bang's disproof and conclusion that God rules the Universe. [Preview Abstract] |
Tuesday, April 8, 2014 2:18PM - 2:30PM |
Y9.00005: Andromeda's SMBH Projected Accretion Rate John Wilson A formula for calculating the half-life of galaxy clusters is proposed. A galactic half-life is the estimated amount of time that the most massive supermassive black hole (SMBH) in the galaxy cluster will have accreted one half of the mass in the cluster. The calculation is based on a projection of the SMBH continuing its exponentially decreasing rate of accretion that it had in its first 13 billion years. The calculated half-life for the Andromeda SMBH is approximately 1.4327e14 years from the Big Bang. Several proposals have suggested that black holes could be significant factors in the formation of new universes. Part of the verification or falsification of this hypothesis could be done by an N-body simulation. These simulations require an enormous amount of computer power and time. Some plausible projection of the growth of the supermassive black hole is needed to prepare an N-body simulation budget proposal. For now, this method provides an estimate for the growth rate of the Andromeda SMBH and deposition of the outcome of most of the galaxy cluster's mass which is either accreted by the SMBH, lost by ejection from the cluster, or lost in the form of energy. [Preview Abstract] |
Tuesday, April 8, 2014 2:30PM - 2:42PM |
Y9.00006: Does Antimatter Appear Dark? Walton Perkins According to Standard Model the photon is an elementary particle and a gauge boson. However, there is another model of the photon with very interesting properties. In 1932 de Broglie suggested that the photon is a composite particle formed of a neutrino-antineutrino pair. This theory, now known as the ``neutrino theory of light,'' has evolved over the years. It still has problems in that it requires massless 2-component neutrinos, while there are indications that neutrinos have mass. In the composite photon theory the photon is $\gamma = \nu_L \overline{\nu}_R$ (electron neutrinos), while the antiphoton is $\overline{\gamma} = \nu_R \overline{\nu}_L$, two particles that have never been observed. Since the neutrino-electron interaction is V-A, the antiphoton neutrinos have the wrong helicity to interact with electrons, rendering the antiphotons undetectable. Conversely, in an antimatter world, for which the neutrino-positron interaction is V+A, photons do not interact with positrons. Thus, antimatter stars and galaxies would appear dark to us, and they would not even reflect light from matter stars. [Preview Abstract] |
Tuesday, April 8, 2014 2:42PM - 2:54PM |
Y9.00007: The U-Theory of Everything (-- A single Particle Theory of Universe) Weiping Yu A new Theory of Everything has been developed. This theory unifies all the field forces in the universe with one single fundamental particle. Using this theory, the author is able to settle the centennial dispute between Einstein's Theory of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. During this presentation, the author will reveal the secrets of the origin of Electric Charge, the origin of Mass, the natures of Gravity, Dark Matter and Dark Energy. The author will also explain the mysteries of Quantum Mechanics Double Slit Experiment and Wave-Particle Duality paradox. [Preview Abstract] |
Follow Us |
Engage
Become an APS Member |
My APS
Renew Membership |
Information for |
About APSThe American Physical Society (APS) is a non-profit membership organization working to advance the knowledge of physics. |
© 2024 American Physical Society
| All rights reserved | Terms of Use
| Contact Us
Headquarters
1 Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740-3844
(301) 209-3200
Editorial Office
100 Motor Pkwy, Suite 110, Hauppauge, NY 11788
(631) 591-4000
Office of Public Affairs
529 14th St NW, Suite 1050, Washington, D.C. 20045-2001
(202) 662-8700